ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2022
Perspectives of Medical Experts' on Health Culture for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Compared to Auxiliary Health Workers.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe viewpoints of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences medical experts'' were compared with those of auxiliary health workers regarding health culture related to human papillomavirus vaccination in 2020.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 220 medical experts' (gynecologists, cultural, psychological, infectious, dermatological, and educational) and auxiliary health workers were randomly selected and investigated. The required data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire modeled on international questionnaires. These questionnaire contained demographic information on the subjects' age and sex as well as health culture was also assessed by measuring the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the subjects.
resultsThe mean age of the included medical experts' and auxiliary health workers was 38.0 3±8.3 and 35.2±7.5 years old, respectively. There was a significant difference in the knowledge of auxiliary health workers as 55.3 ± 3.8 in comparison with the medical experts' as 51.6 3± 6.3 (p <0.002). There was a significant difference on whether changing cultural attitudes about the need for vaccination could be effective on reducing sexually transmitted diseases between the auxiliary health workers and medical experts' (p <0.001). There was a significant difference in the knowledge of auxiliary health workers 55.3 ± 3.8 in comparison with the psychology and cultural experts' as 48.5± 6.3, 48.3± 6.8 (p<0.001) respectively.
conclusionKnowledge among the auxiliary health workers was significantly different from that of psychology and cultural experts' in relation to health culture for human papillomavirus vaccination. It was indicated that these experts need to upgrade their health culture knowledge to increase the rate of community participation in human papillomavirus vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.