Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36579975›Full record

Observational studyNeurourology and urodynamics2023

Total fluid intake, caffeine, and other bladder irritant avoidance among adults having urinary urgency with and without urgency incontinence: The Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN).

Anne P Cameron, Margaret E Helmuth, Abigail R Smith, H Henry Lai, Cindy L Amundsen, Ziya Kirkali, Brenda W Gillespie, Claire C Yang, J Quentin Clemens, LURN Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anne P CameronDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8414-3065
Margaret E HelmuthArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abigail R SmithArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
H Henry LaiDepartments of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Cindy L AmundsenDepartment of Obsterics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ziya KirkaliNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Brenda W GillespieArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Claire C YangDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Quentin ClemensDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
LURN Study Group
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health · USUniversity of Michigan · USDuke Medical Center · USNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USUniversity of Washington · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Continuation of the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN) Data Coordinating CenterU24DK099879 · NIDDK · ARBOR RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE FOR HEALTH · PI GRAFF, JOHN JOSEPH · 2019 to 2025
$6.9M
Phenotype of urinary symptoms and relationships with genotype, sleep and obesityU01DK097779 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GRIFFITH, JAMES WILLIAM, KENTON, KIMBERLY SUE · 2012 to 2025
$5.7M
Advancing the Measurement and Classification of Lower Urinary Tract DysfunctionU01DK097780 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AMUNDSEN, CINDY, JELOVSEK, JOHN ERIC · 2012 to 2025
$5.3M
University of Iowa LURN Research SiteU01DK097772 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BRADLEY, CATHERINE S, KREDER, KARL J · 2012 to 2025
$5.0M
Expansion of Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN)U01DK099879 · NIDDK · ARBOR RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE FOR HEALTH · PI MERION, ROBERT M · 2013 to 2018
$4.6M
University of Washington LURN Research SiteU01DK100011 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YANG, CLAIRE C · 2013 to 2025
$4.5M
University of Michigan LURN Research SiteU01DK099932 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CLEMENS, J. QUENTIN · 2013 to 2023
$4.4M
Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN) Second Phase StudyU01DK100017 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LAI, HING HUNG HENRY · 2013 to 2025
$3.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK097772NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK097779NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK097780NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK099879NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK099932NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK100011NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK100017NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK099879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCaffeine has long been vilified as a cause for urinary urgency incontinence (UUI) along with other potential bladder irritants such as carbonation, alcohol, and acidic juices. The objective of this study was to assess the fluid intake behavior of people with urgency, UUI, and those with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) without UUI or urgency to assess if they avoided certain potential bladder irritants or had different fluid intake. We hypothesized that patients with UUI would avoid caffeine as a self-management method more so than these other two groups.

methodsTreatment-seeking men and women with LUTS in the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN) Observational Cohort study completed a baseline 3-day voiding and intake diary. "Complete" diaries had 3 days of data and no missing intake or voided volumes. Beverages with any caffeine, alcohol, carbonation, or acidic juice were identified and the total volume was recorded as well as the type of beverage containing caffeine to calculate the daily caffeine dose.

resultsFour hundred and ninety-one participants (277 men and 214 women) with a median age of 63 had complete diaries. Urinary urgency was more prevalent in women than men (79% vs. 55%, p < 0.0001) as was UUI (84% vs. 47%, p < 0.0001). Total fluid intake over 3 days was lower among the urgency group versus the nonurgency group (median [interquartile range] 5.2 [4.0-6.8] L vs. 5.7 [4.3-7.0] L, p = 0.028) and the UUI group compared to the urgency without incontinence group were less likely to consume alcohol (26% vs. 37%, p = 0.04). After adjusting for sex, BMI, age, and total intake volume, UUI participants had 54% lower odds of consuming any caffeine (odds ratio = 0.46, 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.96, p = 0.04) than those without incontinence, but among those that did consume caffeine, no difference in the volume of caffeinated beverages or milligrams of caffeine consumed was detected between those with UUI and those with urgency without incontinence. No difference in carbonation or acidic juice intake was detected between groups.

conclusionsIndividuals with urgency consume a lower volume of fluid than those without urgency. UUI participants more often abstain from caffeine, but among those that consume caffeine, the dose is similar to those without UUI. One explanation for these results is that only a subset of individuals with urgency or UUI are caffeine sensitive.

Indexed as

Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrinary IncontinenceUrination DisordersAdultCaffeineFemaleHumansIrritantsMaleUrinary BladderUrinary Incontinence, UrgeCaffeineIrritantscaffeinefluid intakeurgencyurgency incontinencevoiding diary

Identifiers

PMID36579975
PMCPMC9811496
OpenAlexW4307106838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.