Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36579672›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry and clinical neurosciences2023

Effects of Japanese policies and novel hypnotics on long-term prescriptions of hypnotics.

Masahiro Takeshima, Kazuhisa Yoshizawa, Minori Enomoto, Masaya Ogasawara, Mizuki Kudo, Yu Itoh, Naoko Ayabe, Yoshikazu Takaesu, Kazuo Mishima

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masahiro TakeshimaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0614-7524
Kazuhisa YoshizawaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Minori EnomotoDepartment of Medical Technology, School of Health Sciences, Tokyo University of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaya OgasawaraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Mizuki KudoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Yu ItohDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Naoko AyabeDepartment of Regional Studies and Humanities, Faculty of Education and Human Studies, Akita University, Akita, Japan.
Yoshikazu TakaesuDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-3249
Kazuo MishimaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1182-1181
Akita University · JPTokyo University of Technology · JPUniversity of the Ryukyus · JP

Funding

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan 21GC1016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe current study aimed to examine the effect of Japanese policies for appropriate hypnotics use and novel hypnotics (e.g. melatonin receptor agonist and orexin receptor antagonist [ORA]) on long-term prescriptions of hypnotics.

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted using a large-scale health insurance claims database. Among subscribers prescribed hypnotics at least once between April 2005 and March 2021, those prescribed hypnotics for the first time after being included in the database in three periods (period 1: April 2012-March 2013; period 2: April 2016-March 2017; and period 3: April 2018-March 2019) were eligible. These were set considering the timing of the 2014 and 2018 medical fee revisions (2014 for polypharmacy of three or more hypnotics, 2018 for long-term prescription of benzodiazepine receptor agonists for >12 months). The duration of consecutive prescriptions of hypnotics over 12 months was evaluated. Factors associated with short-term prescriptions of hypnotics were also investigated.

resultsIn total, 186 535 participants were newly prescribed hypnotics. The mean duration of prescriptions was 2.9 months, and 9.3% of participants were prescribed hypnotics for 12 months. Prescription periods were not associated with short-term prescriptions of hypnotics. ORA use was associated with short-term prescriptions of hypnotics (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.077 [95% confidence interval, 1.035-1.120]; P < 0.001), but melatonin receptor agonist use was not.

conclusionJapanese policies had no statistically significant effect on long-term prescriptions of hypnotics. Although this study suggests initiating ORA for insomniacs as a candidate strategy to prevent long-term prescriptions of hypnotics, further research is necessary to draw conclusions.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesBenzodiazepinesDrug PrescriptionsHealth PolicyHumansJapanOrexin Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, MelatoninRetrospective StudiesBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesOrexin Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Melatoninbenzodiazepinehypnoticinsomniamelatoninorexin

Identifiers

PMID36579672
PMCPMC11488605
OpenAlexW4313240828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.