ArticlePsychiatry and clinical neurosciences2023
Language patterns in Japanese patients with Alzheimer disease: A machine learning approach.
Article in Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Language Impairments Towards Identifying Markers for Early Diagnosis of Pathological Cognitive Decline.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Quantitative Analysis of Diagnostic Reasoning Using Initial Electronic Medical Records.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The structure of spontaneous speech changes in Alzheimer's disease: Crosslingual evidence from English and Greek.PloS one · 2025Article
- Can the clinical sign "head-turning sign" and simple questions in "Neucop-Q" predict amyloid β pathology?Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2024Article
- Natural language processing in Alzheimer's disease research: Systematic review of methods, data, and efficacy.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe authors applied natural language processing and machine learning to explore the disease-related language patterns that warrant objective measures for assessing language ability in Japanese patients with Alzheimer disease (AD), while most previous studies have used large publicly available data sets in Euro-American languages.
methodsThe authors obtained 276 speech samples from 42 patients with AD and 52 healthy controls, aged 50 years or older. A natural language processing library for Python was used, spaCy, with an add-on library, GiNZA, which is a Japanese parser based on Universal Dependencies designed to facilitate multilingual parser development. The authors used eXtreme Gradient Boosting for our classification algorithm. Each unit of part-of-speech and dependency was tagged and counted to create features such as tag-frequency and tag-to-tag transition-frequency. Each feature's importance was computed during the 100-fold repeated random subsampling validation and averaged.
resultsThe model resulted in an accuracy of 0.84 (SD = 0.06), and an area under the curve of 0.90 (SD = 0.03). Among the features that were important for such predictions, seven of the top 10 features were related to part-of-speech, while the remaining three were related to dependency. A box plot analysis demonstrated that the appearance rates of content words-related features were lower among the patients, whereas those with stagnation-related features were higher.
conclusionThe current study demonstrated a promising level of accuracy for predicting AD and found the language patterns corresponding to the type of lexical-semantic decline known as 'empty speech', which is regarded as a characteristic of AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.