Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36579609›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Tubeless Ureterorenoscopy-Our Experience Using a 120 W Laser and Dusting Technique: Postoperative Pain, Complications, and Readmissions.

Guy Verhovsky, Yishai H Rappaport, Dorit E Zilberman, Amos Neheman, Amnon Zisman, Ilan Gielchinsky, Leon Chertin, Itay M Sabler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guy VerhovskyDepartment of Urology, Shamir Medical Center, Assaf Harofeh Campus, the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2954-9852
Yishai H RappaportDepartment of Urology, Samson Assuta Medical Center, Ashdod, the Goldman School of Medicine, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel.
Dorit E ZilbermanDepartment of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2092-4732
Amos NehemanDepartment of Urology, Shamir Medical Center, Assaf Harofeh Campus, the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Amnon ZismanDepartment of Urology, Shamir Medical Center, Assaf Harofeh Campus, the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Ilan GielchinskyDepartment of Urology, Shamir Medical Center, Assaf Harofeh Campus, the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Leon ChertinDepartment of Urology, Shamir Medical Center, Assaf Harofeh Campus, the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Itay M SablerDepartment of Urology, Shamir Medical Center, Assaf Harofeh Campus, the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILBen-Gurion University of the Negev · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Both double J-stent (DJS) and ureter catheter (UC) drainage represent routine practice following ureterorenoscopy. In select situations, a tubeless approach is possible and safe. In tubeless cases, we use a sheathless dusting technique with the Lumenis® MOSES Pulse™120 H Holmium: YAG laser. We evaluated these three drainage subgroups and compared postoperative pain, complications, and readmissions. Methods: A retrospective database of 269 consecutive patients who underwent primary ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones between October 2018 and August 2019. The cohort was divided according to post-operative drainage as Tubeless, UC, and DJS. The decision on whether to perform post-operative drainage was by surgeon preference. Demographic and clinical parameters such as stone location, number, and burden, hydronephrosis grade, and postoperative complications (fever, acute renal failure, and the obstruction of the upper urinary tract by Stone Street) were assessed. Pain was assessed using a 0−10 Visual Analog Scale score (VAS) and the use of analgesics by dose/case in each group. Results: There were 70 (26%) tubeless, 136 (50%) UC, and 63 (24%) DJS cases. Patients drained with DJSs had a significantly higher stone burden, more severe obstruction, and prolonged operative time. Tubeless and UC-drained patients had the same stone characteristics with maximal diameters of 8.4 (6.1−12) mm and 8 (5.2−11.5) mm in comparison to the stented group, with 12 (8.6−16.6) mm, p < 0.01. The operation time was the longest in the stented group at 49 min (IQR 33−60) in comparison to the UC and tubeless groups at 32 min (23−45) and 28 min (20−40), respectively (p < 0.001). Auxiliary procedures were more prevalent in the stented group, but the overall stone-free rate was not significantly different, p = 0.285. Postoperative ER visits, readmissions, and complications were the highest in the UC-drained group, at 20% in the UC vs. 6% in the tubeless and 10% in the stented groups. Post-operative pain levels and analgesic use were significantly lower in the tubeless group with a significant reduction in opiate usage. Conclusions: A tubeless approach is safe in selected cases with fewer post-operative complications. While DJS should be considered in complex cases, UC may be omitted in straightforward cases since it does not appear to reduce immediate postoperative complications. Those fitted for tubeless procedures had improved postoperative outcomes, facilitating outpatient approach to upper urinary tract stone treatment and patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

nephrolithiasispainstenttubelessureteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID36579609
PMCPMC9699241
OpenAlexW4308711972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.