Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36579588›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Emergency Primary Ureteroscopy for Acute Ureteric Colic-From Guidelines to Practice.

Yasmin Abu-Ghanem, Christina Fontaine, Radha Sehgal, Luke Forster, Neeta Verma, Gidon Ellis, Rajesh Kucheria, Darrell Allen, Paras Singh, Anuj Goyal and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasmin Abu-GhanemDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Christina FontaineDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Radha SehgalDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Luke ForsterDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Neeta VermaDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Gidon EllisDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Rajesh KucheriaDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Darrell AllenDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Paras SinghDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Anuj GoyalDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Leye AjayiDepartment of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the factors that may influence the ability to achieve the present guidelines' recommendations in a well-resourced tertiary centre. According to current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, definitive treatment (primary ureteroscopy (URS) or shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)) should be offered to patients with symptomatic renal colic that are unlikely to pass the stone within 48 h of diagnosis.

methodsRetrospective review of all patients presenting to the emergency department between January and December 2019 with a ureteric or renal stone diagnosis. The rate of emergency intervention, risk factors for intervention and outcomes were compared between patients who were treated by primary definitive surgery vs. primary symptom relief by urethral stenting alone.

resultsA total of 244 patients required surgical management for symptomatic ureteric colic without symptoms of urinary infection. Of those, 92 patients (37.7%) underwent definitive treatment by either primary URS (82 patients) or ESWL (9 patients). The mean time for the procedure was 25.5 h (range: 1-118). Patients who underwent primary definitive treatment were likelier to have smaller and distally located stones than the primary stenting group. Primary ureteroscopy was more likely to be performed in a supervised setting than emergency stenting.

conclusionsAlthough definitive treatment carries high success rates, in a high-volume tertiary referral centre, it may not be feasible to offer it to all patients, with emergency stenting providing a safe and quick interim measure. Factors determining the ability to provide definitive treatment are stone location, stone size and resident supervision in theatre.

Indexed as

definitive treatmentextracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyguidelinestemporizing measuresureteric stentureteric stonesureteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID36579588
PMCPMC9695960
OpenAlexW4308576608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.