ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022
Personalized Medicine for Classical Anesthesia Drugs and Cancer Progression.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circadian Rhythm Genes-based Prognostic Signature for Bladder Cancer: Association of EZH2 Expression with Anesthetic-related Changes in Circulating Tumor Cells.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Impact of anesthetic drugs and modalities on the postoperative outcomes in cancer patients: a literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of propofol on gastrointestinal cancer outcomes: A review of cellular behavior, growth, and metastasis.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Ultrasound Evaluation of the Effect of Impaired Vascular Dilation Function in Diabetic Patients on the Vasodilatory Effect of Nitroglycerin During the Perioperative Period - A Prospective Trial Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Effects of intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on postoperative inflammatory markers in patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective study.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Optimization of a tri-drug treatment against lung cancer using orthogonal design in preclinical studies.PeerJ · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this review, we aim to discuss the use and effect of five different drugs used in the induction of anesthesia in cancer patients. Propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium, sugammadex, and dexamethasone are commonly used to induce anesthesia and prevent pain during surgery. Currently, the mechanisms of these drugs to induce the state of anesthesia are not yet fully understood, despite their use being considered safe. An association between anesthetic agents and cancer progression has been determined; therefore, it is essential to recognize the effects of all agents during cancer treatment and to evaluate whether the treatment provided to the patients could be more precise. We also highlight the use of in silico tools to review drug interaction effects and safety, as well as the efficacy of the treatment used according to different subgroups of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.