Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36579336›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2023

Deep-Learning-Aided Diagnosis of Diabetic Retinopathy, Age-Related Macular Degeneration, and Glaucoma Based on Structural and Angiographic OCT.

Pengxiao Zang, Tristan T Hormel, Thomas S Hwang, Steven T Bailey, David Huang, Yali Jia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Widefield OCT angiography.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Advances in OCT Angiography.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pengxiao ZangCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Tristan T HormelCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Thomas S HwangCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Steven T BaileyCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
David HuangCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Yali JiaCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Timely diagnosis of eye diseases is paramount to obtaining the best treatment outcomes. OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA) have several advantages that lend themselves to early detection of ocular pathology; furthermore, the techniques produce large, feature-rich data volumes. However, the full clinical potential of both OCT and OCTA is stymied when complex data acquired using the techniques must be manually processed. Here, we propose an automated diagnostic framework based on structural OCT and OCTA data volumes that could substantially support the clinical application of these technologies. Design: Cross sectional study. Participants: Five hundred twenty-six OCT and OCTA volumes were scanned from the eyes of 91 healthy participants, 161 patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR), 95 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and 108 patients with glaucoma. Methods: The diagnosis framework was constructed based on semisequential 3-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural networks. The trained framework classifies combined structural OCT and OCTA scans as normal, DR, AMD, or glaucoma. Fivefold cross-validation was performed, with 60% of the data reserved for training, 20% for validation, and 20% for testing. The training, validation, and test data sets were independent, with no shared patients. For scans diagnosed as DR, AMD, or glaucoma, 3D class activation maps were generated to highlight subregions that were considered important by the framework for automated diagnosis. Main Outcome Measures: The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve and quadratic-weighted kappa were used to quantify the diagnostic performance of the framework. Results: For the diagnosis of DR, the framework achieved an AUC of 0.95 ± 0.01. For the diagnosis of AMD, the framework achieved an AUC of 0.98 ± 0.01. For the diagnosis of glaucoma, the framework achieved an AUC of 0.91 ± 0.02. Conclusions: Deep learning frameworks can provide reliable, sensitive, interpretable, and fully automated diagnosis of eye diseases. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Indexed as

3D, 3-dimensionalAge-related macular degenerationAMD, age-related macular degenerationAUC, area under the curveCAM, class activation mapDeep learningDiabetic retinopathyDR, diabetic retinopathyGlaucomaOCTOCTA, OCT angiographyROC, receiver operating characteristic

Identifiers

PMID36579336
PMCPMC9791595
OpenAlexW4308738068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.