Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36579303›Full record

ReviewHealth and human rights2022

Menstruation, Myopia, and Marginalization: Advancing Menstrual Policies to "Keep Girls in School" at the Risk of Exacerbating Inequalities.

Nay Alhelou, Purvaja S Kavattur, Mary M Olson, Lillian Rountree, Inga T Winkler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health and human rights, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nay AlhelouA research coordinator at the Population Council and former research fellow at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights at Columbia University, New York, United States.
Purvaja S KavatturA researcher with the National Advocates for Pregnant Women, and former staff associate at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights at Columbia University, New York, United States.
Mary M OlsonA researcher at Columbia University, New York, United States, specializing in economics and its intersections with human rights and gender.
Lillian RountreeAn undergraduate at Columbia University, New York, United States, studies statistics and French with a research focus on menstrual health and contraception.
Inga T WinklerAn associate professor in human rights in the Legal Studies Department at the Central European University in Vienna, Austria, and former lecturer in human rights at Columbia University, New York, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As countries across the world adopt policies addressing menstruation, it is imperative to identify who benefits from such policies and to understand the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion. We examine such policies through the lens of human rights, as a framework that demands addressing marginalization, ensuring substantive equality, and guaranteeing inclusive participation to ensure that the menstrual needs of everyone, everywhere are met. Our review is focused on four countries (India, Kenya, Senegal, and the United States) and is based on data from 34 policy documents and interviews with 85 participants. We show that girls, particularly school-going girls, are the main target group of policies. Due to this myopic view of menstrual needs, policies risk leaving the needs of adult menstruators, including those experiencing (peri)menopause, unaddressed. Moreover, the intersection between menstrual status and markers of identity such as disability and gender identity produces further policy gaps. These gaps can be attributed to the exclusion of marginalized menstruators from decision-making processes by creating barriers and failing to ensure meaningful inclusive participation. To address inequalities, policy makers need to make a concerted effort to understand and accommodate the needs of menstruators in all their diversity.

Indexed as

Gender IdentityMenstruationAdultFemaleHuman RightsHumansPolicySchools

Identifiers

PMID36579303
PMCPMC9790947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.