Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36579179›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2022

Comparison of Swiss versus Standard Acupuncture in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind, Parallel Trial.

Saroj K Pradhan, Felix Angst, Jie Xu, Andreas R Gantenbein, Susanne Lehmann, Peter S Sandor, Yiming Li, Michael Furian

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05232487 (Comparison of Swiss Versus Standard Low Back Acupuncture in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. A Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind, Monocentric Clinical Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05232487 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Swiss Versus Standard Low Back Acupuncture in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. A Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind, Monocentric Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLi YimingRan2023 to 2025Enrolled116ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsSwiss low back acupuncture (SLBA), Standard acupuncture (SA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saroj K PradhanResearch Department, Swiss University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9396-3428
Felix AngstResearch Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
Jie XuResearch Department, Swiss University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
Andreas R GantenbeinNeurorehabilitation & Research Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
Susanne LehmannResearch Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
Peter S SandorNeurorehabilitation & Research Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
Yiming LiResearch Department, Swiss University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
Michael FurianResearch Department, Swiss University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8518-5029
Stiftung für Forschung in Spätantike und Mittelalter HR. Sennhauser · CHSchweizerisches Universitäres Institut für Traditionelle Chinesische Medizin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) cannot sufficiently be treated by pharmacological therapy and generates substantial health-care costs worldwide. Acupuncture, a cost-effective, safe and non-pharmacological therapy, has shown promising results in relieving acute low back pain; however, the optimal acupuncture therapy for CLBP remains controversial. This study will compare two acupuncture methods for pain relief in CLBP. Methods and Analysis: This randomized, controlled, single-blind, parallel trial will be conducted in patients with clinically diagnosed CLBP with a disease duration ≥3 months and an average pain intensity of ≥4 points on an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (pain-NRS) on the previous 7 days. Patients will be randomized to 9-week acupuncture therapy using Jiu Gong Points (termed Swiss low back acupuncture, SLBA) or standard acupuncture (SA) therapy (weeks 1-6: two sessions/week, weeks 7-9: one session/week, 15 sessions/patient in total). Measurements will be conducted before the first session (T1), at the end of the 9-week therapy (T2) and after 3- and 6-month follow-up (T3 and T4). The primary hypothesis is that 9 weeks of SLBA will be superior in reducing the pain severity assessed by the pain-NRS compared to SA therapy for CLBP. Secondary outcomes will be derived from the Short-Form 36, Oswestry Disability Index, Multidimensional Pain Inventory questionnaire, Symptom Checklist-90 - Revised questionnaire and a daily pain diary. Assuming a minimal clinically important difference in the pain-NRS of 0.39 and an effect size of ≥0.6 between SLBA and SA, 80% power, 0.05 alpha level and 20% dropouts, a total of 55 patients/arm will be required. The primary outcome will be analyzed in the intention-to-treat population using chained linear regression models. Patients, outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment arm. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05232487.

Indexed as

Chinese medicinechronic diseaseMultidimensional Pain InventoryOswestry Disability IndexpainPain Intensity Numerical Rating ScaleRandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID36579179
PMCPMC9792106
OpenAlexW4312073894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.