Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36579168›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2022

The evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders.

Jan J Kreider, Boris H Kramer, Jan Komdeur, Ido Pen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eusocial reproduction selects for longevity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. The evolution of cooperative breeding in family groups: when should parents tolerate unhelpful helpers?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. More social species live longer, have longer generation times and longer reproductive windows.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan J KreiderTheoretical Research in Evolutionary Life Sciences, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences University of Groningen Groningen 9747 AG The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-5344
Boris H KramerTheoretical Research in Evolutionary Life Sciences, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences University of Groningen Groningen 9747 AG The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2775-1918
Jan KomdeurBehavioural and Physiological Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences University of Groningen Groningen 9747 AG The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-0124
Ido PenTheoretical Research in Evolutionary Life Sciences, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences University of Groningen Groningen 9747 AG The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2512-378X
University of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperatively breeding animals live longer than their solitary counterparts. This has been suggested for birds, mole rats, and social insects. A common explanation for these long lifespans is that cooperative breeding evolves more readily in long-lived species because lower mortality reduces the rate of territory turnover and thus leads to a limitation of breeding territories. Here, we reverse this argument and show that-rather than being a cause for its evolution-long lifespans are an evolutionary consequence of cooperative breeding. In evolutionary individual-based simulations, we show that natural selection favors a delayed onset of senescence in cooperative breeders, relative to solitary breeders, because cooperative breeders have a delayed age of first reproduction as helpers wait in a reproductive queue to obtain breeder status. Especially long lifespans evolve in cooperative breeders in which queue positions depend on the helpers' age rank among the helpers within the breeding territory. Furthermore, we show that lower genetic relatedness among group members leads to the evolution of longer lifespans. This is because selection against higher mortality is weaker when mortality reduces competition for breeding between relatives. Our results link the evolutionary theory of ageing with kin selection theory, demonstrating that the evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders is driven by the timing of reproduction and kin structure within breeding territories.

Indexed as

Ageingcooperative breedinginclusive fitnessindividual‐based simulationskin selectionlife historylifespanreproductive queueingsenescencesociality

Identifiers

PMID36579168
PMCPMC9783459
OpenAlexW4311111857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.