Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36579165›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2022

Divergence and introgression among the

Leeban H Yusuf, Venera Tyukmaeva, Anneli Hoikkala, Michael G Ritchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic analyses inEvolution letters · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Invasive African fig flies (microPublication biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chromosomal inversions and their impact on insect evolution.Current opinion in insect science · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leeban H YusufCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology University of St Andrews St Andrews KY16 9TH United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6383-1176
Venera TyukmaevaCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology University of St Andrews St Andrews KY16 9TH United Kingdom.
Anneli HoikkalaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä 40014 Finland.
Michael G RitchieCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology University of St Andrews St Andrews KY16 9TH United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7913-8675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speciation with gene flow is now widely regarded as common. However, the frequency of introgression between recently diverged species and the evolutionary consequences of gene flow are still poorly understood. The

Indexed as

Divergencegene flowintrogressionphylogenomicsreproductive isolationspeciation

Identifiers

PMID36579165
PMCPMC9783487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.