ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2022
Adolescent Athletes Achieve High Levels of Athletic and Daily Function After Arthroscopic Marrow Stimulation for Elbow Capitellar Osteochondritis Dissecans.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity and Reliability of the European Portuguese Version of the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder & Elbow Score (KJOC).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Elbow in Overhead Athletes: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the functional outcomes of adolescent athletes treated with arthroscopic marrow stimulation/microfracture for elbow capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD). Methods: The medical records for all patients younger than 18 years of age with capitellar OCD who underwent arthroscopic treatment at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The variables examined included patient characteristics, bone age, pre- and postoperative lesion grade/size and range of motion (ROM), intraoperative lesion grade/size, time to postoperative return to sport, and validated outcome scores. Results: Twenty patients with 21 treated elbows met the study's inclusion criteria. Three patients were not available for follow-up, leaving 18 of 21 (85.7%) elbows in the final cohort. Mean age and follow-up was 14.1 and 4.4 years, respectively. All 18 elbows were treated with diagnostic arthroscopy, arthroscopic debridement with loose body removal as indicated, and marrow stimulation. Sixteen of 18 (88.9%) elbows returned to sports postoperatively, with 12 of 18 (66.7%) elbows returning to their primary sport at the same level or higher. Overall, there were significant improvements in elbow ROM (132.8°, range 120°-140° postoperatively, compared with 122.1°, range 80°-140° preoperatively) ( Conclusions: Arthroscopic debridement and marrow stimulation for capitellar OCD in adolescent athletes leads to improvements in ROM, as well as a high rate of return to sport, and high levels of athletic and daily functional activity during follow-up, regardless of bone age and lesion grade/size at time of surgery. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.