ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis mediate the effect of CA242 on prognosis in hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients after radical resection.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative colon cancer nodal staging using dual-energy CT and clinically derived features.European radiology · 2026Article
- Analysis of prognostic factors for R1/R2 resection in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Portal vein reconstruction reduces textbook outcome achievement following radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients accepting preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage experienced high incidence of portal vein invasion and lymph node metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- An overview of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: from here to where?Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Carbohydrate antigen 242 has been clinically used as a diagnostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer. However, the prognostic role of CA242 in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) has not been identified. Also, it remains unclear to what extents the vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis mediate the effect of serum CA242 on prognosis. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis mediate the relationship between CA242 levels and clinical prognosis in HCCA patients after radical resection. Methods: Data of 234 HCCA patients who accepted radical resection from March 2008 to December 2014 were analyzed. Vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis were assessed by postoperative pathological examinations. Mediation analysis was performed to study the potential causal relationship between CA242 and overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Among 234 HCCA patients, 104 patients (44.4%) with normal CA242 levels (≤ 20 IU/ml) had significantly better OS (p=0.004) and RFS (p=0.001) than those 130 patients (55.6%) with elevated CA242 levels (>20 IU/ml). The logistic analysis showed that elevated CA242 was an independent risk factor for vascular invasion (p=0.006) and lymph nodes metastasis (p=0.040). The causal mediation analysis indicated that the vascular invasion (p=0.012 for OS; p=0.036 for RFS) and lymph nodes metastasis (p=0.024 for OS; p=0.014 for RFS) played significant roles in mediating the effect of serum CA242 on OS and RFS. Conclusion: Serum elevated CA242 could be a novel marker for prognosis prediction in HCCA patients. Vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis mediated the relationship between CA242 and clinical prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.