Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36578905›Full record

ArticleToxicon: X2023

Perspectives on snakebite envenoming care needs across different sociocultural contexts and health systems: A comparative qualitative analysis among US and Brazilian health providers.

Eleanor Strand, Felipe Murta, Anna Tupetz, Loren Barcenas, Ashley J Phillips, Altair Seabra Farias, Alícia Cacau Santos, Gisele Dos Santos Rocha, Catherine A Staton, Flávia Regina Ramos and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicon: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Treatment and treatment outcomes of snakebite envenoming in Uganda: a retrospective analysis.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Eleanor StrandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Felipe MurtaEscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Anna TupetzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Loren BarcenasDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Ashley J PhillipsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Altair Seabra FariasEscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Alícia Cacau SantosEscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Gisele Dos Santos RochaEscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Catherine A StatonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Flávia Regina RamosEscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Vinícius Azevedo MachadoEscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Fan Hui WenInstituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
João R N VissociDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Jacqueline SachettEscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Wuelton MonteiroEscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Charles J GerardoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

Using community health centers to mitigate the impact of snakebite envenoming in low resource areasR21TW011944 · FIC · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GERARDO, CHARLES JOHN · 2021 to 2022
$534k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW011944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advancements in therapeutics and available treatment options, almost all deaths and permanent disabilities from snakebite envenoming (SBE) are preventable. The challenge lies in implementing these evidence-based treatments and practices across different settings and populations. This study aims to compare data on provider perceptions of SBE care across health systems and cultural contexts to inform potential implementation science approaches. We hypothesize different health systems and cultural contexts will influence specific perceived needs to provide adequate snakebite care within central tenets of care delivery (e.g., cost, access, human resources). We previously conducted exploratory descriptive studies in the US and Brazil in order to understand the experience, knowledge, and perceptions of health professionals treating SBE. In the US, in-depth interviews were performed with emergency physicians from January 2020 to March 2020. In BR, focus group discussions were conducted with health professionals from community health centers at the end of June 2021. The focus group discussions (BR) were originally analyzed through an inductive thematic analysis approach. We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis in which this codebook was then applied to the interviews (US) in a deductive content analysis. The analysis concluded in August 2022. Brazil participants were physicians (n=5) or nurses (n=20) from three municipalities in the State of Amazonas with an average of three years of professional experience. US participants were emergency physicians (n=16) with an average of 15 years of professional experience. Four main themes emerged: 1) barriers to adequate care on the patient and/or community side and 2) on the health system side, 3) perceived considerations for how to address SBE, and 4) identified needs for improving care. There were 25 subthemes within the four themes. These subthemes were largely the same across the Brazil and US data, but the rationale and content within each shared subtheme varied significantly. For example, the subtheme "role of health professionals in improving care" extended across Brazil and the US. Brazil emphasized the need for task-shifting and -sharing amongst health care disciplines, whereas the US suggested specialized approaches geared toward increasing access to toxicologists and other referral resources. Despite similar core barriers to adequate snakebite envenoming care and factors to consider when trying to improve care delivery, health professionals in different health systems and sociocultural contexts identified different needs. Accounting for, and understanding, these differences is crucial to the success of initiatives intended to strengthen snakebite envenoming care. Implementation science efforts, with explicit health professional input, should be applied to develop new and/or adapt existing evidence-based treatments and practices for SBE.

Indexed as

Access to careAntivenomCare deliveryHealth professionalsImplementation scienceSnakebite envenoming

Identifiers

PMID36578905
PMCPMC9791583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.