Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36578856›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

The Efficacy of Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement by Combining Self-Ligating Brackets With One or More Acceleration Methods: A Systematic Review.

Heba M Al-Ibrahim, Mohammad Y Hajeer, Ahmad S Burhan, Kinda Sultan, Mowaffak A Ajaj, Luai Mahaini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07243509 (Evaluation of the Efficacy of Sliding Mechanisms on Round Versus Rectangular Archwires in Canine Retraction After First Premolar Extraction in Class II Malocclusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07243509 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Sliding Mechanisms on Round Versus Rectangular Archwires in Canine Retraction After First Premolar Extraction in Class II Malocclusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamascus UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled38ConditionsCLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSIONArmsRound-cross-section archwire, Rectangular-cross-section archwire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heba M Al-IbrahimDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, SYR.
Mohammad Y HajeerDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, SYR.
Ahmad S BurhanDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, SYR.
Kinda SultanDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, SYR.
Mowaffak A AjajDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, SYR.
Luai MahainiDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, SYR.
Damascus University · SY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using one or more acceleration methods with self-ligating brackets to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement in adults and the associated effects of these interventions. An electronic search of the following databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, EMBASE) was performed (From January 1990 to November 2021). ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were also electronically searched to find any unpublished studies and ongoing trials. The selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involved adult patients treated using self-ligating brackets combined with one or more acceleration methods compared with self-ligating brackets or conditional brackets alone. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. A total of seven RCTs and one controlled clinical trial (CCT) were included in this review. Combining self-ligating brackets with flapless corticotomy, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and infrared light accelerated orthodontic movement by 43% and 50% for surgical methods, 20-50% for LLLT, and 22% for infrared light. Regarding side effects on periodontal tissues, neither flapless corticotomy nor low-frequency vibrational forces caused any damage. Combining self-ligating brackets and flapless corticotomy, low-level laser, or infrared light effectively accelerated orthodontic movement by 20% to 50 %. In contrast, the combination of self-ligating brackets with vibrational forces did not affect speeding tooth movement. The acceleration methods did not have any side effects on the periodontal tissues, but the available evidence was insufficient. There is a need for further primary research regarding the effectiveness of combining self-ligating brackets with acceleration methods and the possible untoward side effects.

Indexed as

acceleration methodsacceleration tooth movementinfrared light therapyllltorthodonticsself-ligated bracketsself-ligating bracketsside effectssurgically assisted tooth movementvibrational forces

Identifiers

PMID36578856
PMCPMC9788653
OpenAlexW4312165501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.