Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36578803›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2022

Incidence and Risk of Lung Cancer in Tuberculosis Patients, and Vice Versa: A Literature Review of the Last Decade.

Sutapa Bhowmik, Nayan Chandra Mohanto, Dipanjon Sarker, Asma Ahsan Sorove

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lung Lesions: Differential Diagnoses Beyond Cancer.The American journal of case reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sutapa BhowmikDepartment of Microbiology, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali 3814, Bangladesh.
Nayan Chandra MohantoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of life Sciences, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5803-1534
Dipanjon SarkerDepartment of Microbiology, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali 3814, Bangladesh.
Asma Ahsan SoroveDepartment of Microbiology, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali 3814, Bangladesh.
Noakhali Science and Technology University · BDShahjalal University of Science and Technology · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence and risk of both lung cancer (LC) and tuberculosis (TB) are increasing rapidly. These two diseases frequently exist together and can influence the incidence and risk of each other. The aim of the current review was to summarize the incidence and risk of LC in TB patients, and vice versa, short out research gap, and contemplate future research perspectives. Results: We found higher incidence rate and risks (1.64 to 6 times higher) of LC in TB patients in comparison to non-TB participants. However, the incidence rate and risks of TB in LC patients were comparatively low. Male patients were exhibited higher risks than female. The medical comorbidities, smoking habits, and age can also influence the associations and risks of LC in TB patients or vice versa. Conclusion: Our summarized studies might suggest that existing active TB may increase the incidence and risk of LC. However, large prospective cohort study is warranted to explore the real scenario worldwide.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsTuberculosisFemaleHumansIncidenceLungMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36578803
PMCPMC9792248
OpenAlexW4313313066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.