ArticleIndian journal of dermatology
Experience of Rituximab Therapy in Pemphigus: A Three-Year Retrospective Study from a Sub-Himalayan State.
Article in Indian journal of dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Pemphigus Foliaceus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- A recalcitrant case of pemphigus treated with inebilizumab.JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- Pemphigus relapse: Mechanisms, risk factors, and agents associated with disease recurrence.The Journal of dermatology · 2024Review
- Focus on pemphigus treatment publications: A bibliometric and visual analysis (1992-2022).Heliyon · 2024Review
- Treatment of Pediatric Pemphigus Foliaceus.Cureus · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pemphigus is a group of auto-immune blistering disorders, characterised clinically by mucocutaneous blisters and erosions and histopathologically by intra-epidermal acantholysis. It was traditionally associated with high morbidity and mortality. The use of rituximab has brought upon a new dawn in the treatment of pemphigus. Aim: A retrospective analysis to ascertain the efficacy, tolerance, adverse effect profile, remission, and relapse with the use of rituximab. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of all diagnosed pemphigus patients who received rituximab therapy over a period of 3 years was performed. The patient's baseline characteristics, disease duration, clinical presentations, mucosal involvement, disease-severity assessment, and adverse events with rituximab were noted. The outcomes were evaluated based on the definitions of the disease-outcome parameters as early and late endpoints. Results: Of the 17 pemphigus patients, there were 14 females (82.4%) and three males (17.6%) with a mean age of 35.9 ± 16.5 years (range: 9-65 years). Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) was the predominant type in 11 (64.7%) patients. After rituximab infusion, the 17 patients attained the end of consolidation phase (ECP) within 15 days to 3 months, and the mean duration was 1.24 months. The complete remission (CR on/off) ranged from 0.5 to 35 months, and the mean duration of remission was 21.7 months. Within a median time of 4.2 months, almost 80% patients achieved CR on therapy. Nine (53%) patients were in CR without any therapy till the end of the study period, and eight (47%) were in remission while on minimal therapy. Conclusion: Rituximab is an efficacious therapeutic agent for pemphigus and is better tolerated and safer to all the previous medications used in the treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.