Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36578695›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2023

Successful application of the innovation process to a case of Floyd Type I tracheal agenesis.

Alicia Greene, Yiqi Zhang, Onur Asan, Joseph B Clark, Barry Fell, Kevin Harter, Thomas Samson, Dino Ravnic, Robert E Cilley, Peter Dillon and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alicia GreeneDivision of General Surgery, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, USA.
Yiqi ZhangDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Onur AsanSchool of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Joseph B ClarkDivision of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, USA.
Barry FellDivision of General Surgery, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, USA.
Kevin HarterCenter for Medical Innovation, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Thomas SamsonDivision of Plastic Surgery, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, USA.
Dino RavnicDivision of Plastic Surgery, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, USA.
Robert E CilleyDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, USA.
Peter DillonDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, USA.
Donald MackayDivision of Plastic Surgery, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, USA.
Anthony Y TsaiDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, USA.
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USPennsylvania State University · USStevens Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Innovation is broadly defined as the act of introducing a new product, idea, or process. The field of surgery is built upon innovation, revolutionizing technology, science, and tools to improve patient care. While most innovative solutions are aimed at problems with a significant patient population, the process can also be used on orphan pathologies without obvious solutions. We present a case of tracheal agenesis, a rare congenital anomaly with an overwhelming mortality and few good treatment options, that benefited from the innovation process and achieved survival with no ventilator dependence at three years of age. Methods: Utilizing the framework of the innovation process akin to the Stanford Biodesign Program, 1) the parameters of the clinical problem were Results: A 3D-printed external bioresorbable splint was chosen as the solution. Our patient underwent airway reconstruction with "trachealization of the esophagus": esophageotracheal fistula resection, esophagotracheoplasty, and placement of a 3D-printed polycaprolactone (PCL) stent for external esophageal airway support at five months of age. Conclusions: The innovation process provided our team with the guidance and imperative steps necessary to develop an innovative device for the successful management of an infant survivor with Floyd Type I tracheal agenesis. Article summary: We present a case of tracheal agenesis, a rare congenital anomaly with an overwhelming mortality and few good treatment options, that benefited from the innovation process and achieved survival with no ventilator dependence at three years of age.The importance of this report is to reveal how the innovation process, which is typically used for problems with significant patient population, can also be used on orphan pathologies without obvious solutions.

Indexed as

Innovation processNeeds findingPediatric surgerySurgical innovationTracheal agenesis

Identifiers

PMID36578695
PMCPMC9791920
OpenAlexW4312082623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.