Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36578668›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Validation of a Simple-to-Use, Affordable, Portable Wavefront Aberrometry-Based Auto Refractometer in a Paediatric Population.

Divya Parthasarathy Rao, Kalpa Negiloni, Sivasunadaravadivel Gurunathan, Selvaraj Velkumar, Anand Sivaraman, Adeeb Ulla Baig, Kumari B, Kaushik Murali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Retinoscopes: Past and present.World journal of methodology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Divya Parthasarathy RaoR&D, Remidio Innovative Solutions Inc, Glen Allen, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7032-843X
Kalpa NegiloniR&D, Remidio Innovative Solutions Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4768-066X
Sivasunadaravadivel GurunathanR&D, Remidio Innovative Solutions Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru, India.
Selvaraj VelkumarR&D, Remidio Innovative Solutions Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru, India.
Anand SivaramanR&D, Remidio Innovative Solutions Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru, India.
Adeeb Ulla BaigR&D, Remidio Innovative Solutions Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru, India.
Kumari BDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Sankara Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, India.
Kaushik MuraliDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Sankara Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1385-3227
Remidio Innovative Solutions (India) · INEye Hospital in Bangalore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: InstaRef R20 is a handheld, affordable auto refractometer based on Shack Hartmann aberrometry technology. The study's objective was to compare InstaRef R20's performance for identifying refractive error in a paediatric population to that of standard subjective and objective refraction under both pre- and post-cycloplegic conditions. Methods: Refraction was performed using 1) standard clinical procedure consisting of retinoscopy followed by subjective refraction (SR) under pre- and post-cycloplegic conditions and 2) InstaRef R20. Agreement between both methods was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. The repeatability of the device based on three measurements in a subgroup of 20 children was assessed. Results: The refractive error was measured in 132 children (mean age 12.31 ± 3 years). The spherical equivalent (M) and cylindrical components (J0 and J45) of the device had clinically acceptable differences (within ±0.50D) and acceptable agreement compared to standard pre- and post-cycloplegic manual retinoscopy and subjective refraction (SR). The device agreed within ± 0.50D of retinoscopy in 67% of eyes for M, 78% for J0 and 80% for J45 and within ± 0.50D of SR in 70% for M and 77% for cylindrical components. Conclusion: InstaRef R20 has an acceptable agreement compared to standard retinoscopy in paediatric population. The measurements from this device can be used as a starting point for subjective acceptance. The device being simple to use, portable, reliable and affordable has the potential for large-scale community-based refractive error detection.

Indexed as

auto refractometerInstaRef R20pediatric refractionrefractive errorwavefront aberrometry

Identifiers

PMID36578668
PMCPMC9792114
OpenAlexW4312189307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.