ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022
Ten-Year Outcomes of LASIK for Pediatric Myopic Anisometropia.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measuring and Correction Methods of H.-J. Haase Improve Binocular Vision in Patients with Severe Anisometropia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Refractive Surgery in Myopic Children.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate long-term safety, effectiveness, and stability of unilateral LASIK in pediatric myopic anisometropic amblyopia. Methods: This retrospective study included children who received unilateral LASIK for myopic anisometropia of >6 D, after mandatory 6-month occlusion/penalization therapy. They were evaluated at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and biannually until 10 years. Outcome measures included visual acuity, refraction, ocular alignment, stereopsis, corneal clarity, and corneal topography. Results: 32 patients (16 girls) with mean age of 8.6 ± 2.3 years completed 10 years of follow up after unilateral LASIK. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SER) was -10.3D ±2.0D in the affected eye, with anisometropic difference of -9.5D ±1.7D. Mean post-LASIK SER was -1.3D±0.8D (p<0.001). Anisometropia significantly decreased to 0.3D±0.8D, 0.4D±1.0D, and 1.0±2.5D at 6 months, 1 year and 10 years respectively (p<0.001). 11 patients (34%) who had preoperative intermittent exotropia (< 15°) regained orthophoria in all gazes, while 5 of 10 who had constant exotropia with large angle (>30°) required strabismus surgery for ocular alignment. BCVA improved from 0.04±0.6 Decimal at baseline to 0.6 ±0.2 after LASIK and occlusion therapy (p< 0.001). Despite insignificant refractive regression in both eyes, patients have maintained orthophoria, improved stereopsis, clear cornea, and the topography showed no evidence of post-LASIK ectasia. Conclusion: LASIK appears safe, effective, and stable for correcting refractory pediatric myopic anisometropia, in which conventional measures fail or endanger normal visual development. Eliminating anisometropic aniseikonia consequently restores binocular vision and stereopsis which, along with amblyopia therapy, would reverse amblyopia and prevent recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.