Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36578665›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Time and Distance Cost of Longer Acting Anti-VEGF Therapies for Macular Degeneration: Contributions to Drug Cost Comparisons.

Elana A Meer, Dennis H Oh, Frank L Brodie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Adoption patterns of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies in retinal disease.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gene Therapy for Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Influence of lesion location on lesion reactivation after initial treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elana A MeerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1100-4923
Dennis H OhDermatology Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Frank L BrodieDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
San Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the holistic cost of longer acting anti-VEGF therapy for macular degeneration when considering the associated costs of travel to the retina clinic. Design: Theoretical evaluation of cost using publicly available pricing data and reimbursements at the Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center. Patients and Methods: Setting: VA Medical Center. Study population: Patients with age related macular degeneration. Main outcome measures: Three-year cost of therapy when considering medication as well as travel costs and time spent in transit. Results: Based on cost data derived purely from wholesale acquisition cost and projected injection frequency over the first three years of treatment, faricimab is less expensive than ranibizumab and aflibercept by $37,709 and $6359, respectively. Aflibercept is less expensive ranibizumab by $31,350 over the first 3 years of treatment. When considering even small distances traveled by patients, these cost differences grow, amplified at even larger distances: at 25 miles, ranibizumab becomes $38,814 and $32,133 more expensive than faricimab and aflibercept, respectively. Aflibercept becomes $6681 more expensive than faricimab. At 100 miles, ranibizumab becomes $41,502 and $34,038 more expensive than faricimab and aflibercept, respectively. Aflibercept becomes $7464 more expensive than faricimab. Conclusion: Longer acting anti-VEGF therapies may differ not only in their wholesale acquisition cost, but also in the frequency of per label injections and associated clinic visits. Taking into account distance and time cost of travel may contribute to a more holistic view of cost differences among these therapies.

Indexed as

anti-VEGF injectionsdistance costlonger acting therapymacular degenerationtravel cost

Identifiers

PMID36578665
PMCPMC9792116
OpenAlexW4312070261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.