Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36578567›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Gut and lung microbiome profiles in pregnant mice.

Rosana Wiscovitch-Russo, Aji Mary Taal, Claire Kuelbs, Lauren M Oldfield, MohanKumar Ramar, Harinder Singh, Alexey V Fedulov, Norberto Gonzalez-Juarbe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosana Wiscovitch-RussoJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.
Aji Mary TaalJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.
Claire KuelbsJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.
Lauren M OldfieldJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.
MohanKumar RamarDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Research, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Harinder SinghJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.
Alexey V FedulovDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Research, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Norberto Gonzalez-JuarbeJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.
J. Craig Venter Institute · USRhode Island Hospital · US

Funding

Microbiome in Asthma Induced by Environmental Particle ExposureR01ES030227 · NIEHS · J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI FEDULOV, ALEXEY V, GONZALEZ-JUARBE, NORBERTO · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, microbiome research has expanded from the gastrointestinal tract to other host sites previously thought to be abacterial such as the lungs. Yet, the effects of pregnancy in the lung and gut microbiome remains unclear. Here we examined the changes in the gut and lung microbiome in mice at 14 days of gestation. Lung tissue and stool samples were collected from pregnant and non-pregnant female BALB/c mice, DNA was isolated, amplified, and bacterial specific V4 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Using an in-house bioinformatic pipeline we assessed the microbial composition of each organ using stool and lung tissue samples. The stool data showed that Lachnospiraceae and Lactobacillaceae were more abundant in the pregnant mice. Likewise, Lactobacillaceae were dominant in the lungs of pregnant mice. However, Streptococcaceae were dominant in the lungs of non-pregnant mice with a low microbial abundance in the pregnant mice. A permutation test showed that pregnancy significantly contributes to the variance in both the lung and stool microbiome. At the same time, we estimate that 49% of the total detected operational taxonomic units were shared between the stool and lung data. After removing common stool-associated bacteria from the lung dataset, no microbial differential abundance was detected between the pregnant and non-pregnant lung microbial community. Thus, pregnancy contributes to variance to the lung and stool microbiome but not in the unique lung microbiota.

Indexed as

16S sequencelungmicrobiomepregnancystool

Identifiers

PMID36578567
PMCPMC9791091
OpenAlexW4312123596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.