SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2022
Efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- A new hope with CAR T-cell therapy for refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a systematic review.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Targeted immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Case study of CD19 CAR T therapy in a subject with immune-mediate necrotizing myopathy treated in the RESET-Myositis phase I/II trial.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Anti-HMGCR antibody-positive immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy associated with rectal adenocarcinoma: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Emerging therapies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies-Treatment Perspective of Highly Specialised Rheumatology Centre.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Bispecific T cell engagers for treatment-refractory autoimmune connective tissue diseases.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- CAR-T therapy for autoimmune rheumatic diseases: navigating clinical frontiers between breakthroughs and uncertainties.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Dermatomyositis: Prevalence, Clinical Spectrum, Diagnostic Approach, and Management Strategies.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- CAR-T and BiTE: new horizons in the treatment of rheumatic autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Rituximab in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: From Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A pilot study of telitacicept in predominantly immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, retrospective analysis of a monocentric Chinese cohort.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Autoimmune Neuromuscular Disorders at a Molecular Crossroad: Linking Pathogenesis to Targeted Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Targeted Therapy for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Review
- Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy: A Systematic Review of Antibody-Specific Mechanisms and Treatment Outcomes.Cureus · 2025Review
- Rapidly Progressive Polymyositis With Vasculitis: The Pivotal Role of Histopathology in Diagnosis and Management.Cureus · 2025Article
- Malignancy in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: Recent Insights.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- Targeting B Cells for the Treatment of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and C3 glomerulopathy: a rare association.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases with various subtypes, myositis-specific antibodies, and affect multiple systems. The treatment of IIMs remains challenging, especially for refractory myositis. In addition to steroids and traditional immunosuppressants, rituximab (RTX), a B cell-depleting monoclonal antibody, is emerging as an alternative treatment for refractory myositis. However, the therapeutic response to RTX remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of RTX in patients with IIMs, excluding sporadic inclusion body myositis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang Data were searched for relevant studies. The overall effective rate, complete response rate, and partial response rate were calculated to assess the efficacy of RTX. The incidences of adverse events, infection, severe adverse events, severe infection, and infusion reactions were collected to evaluate the safety of RTX. Subgroup analyses were performed using IIM subtypes, affected organs, continents, and countries. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 26 studies were included in the quantitative analysis, which showed that 65% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 54%, 75%) of patients with IIMs responded to RTX, 45% (95% CI: 22%, 70%) of patients achieved a complete response, and 39% (95% CI: 26%, 53%) achieved a partial response. Subgroup analyses indicated that the overall efficacy rates in patients with refractory IIMs, dermatomyositis and polymyositis, as well as anti-synthetase syndrome were 62%, 68%, and 62%, respectively. The overall efficacy rates for muscle, lungs, and skin involvement were 59%, 65%, and 81%, respectively. In addition, studies conducted in Germany and the United States showed that patients with IIMs had an excellent response to RTX, with an effective rate of 90% and 77%, respectively. The incidence of severe adverse events and infections was 8% and 2%, respectively. Conclusion: RTX may be an effective and relatively safe treatment choice in patients with IIMs, especially for refractory cases. However, further verification
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.