ReviewJPRAS open2023
The Effects of Glutamine Supplementation on Reducing Mortality and Morbidity among Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in JPRAS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring evidence gaps in clinical trials in thermal burns care: an umbrella review.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Tolerability of glutamine supplementation in older adults: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2024Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glutamine (GLN) has been proven to improve the prognosis of severely burned patients. GLN supplementation in critical illness has gained extreme popularity among researchers over the years, and its safety and efficacy are still under question. Therefore, we aim to study the role of GLN supplements in decreasing mortality, length of hospitalization (LOH), and infection in severely burned patients. PRISMA guidelines were used to design and conduct this systematic review. MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were used to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in January 2022. In order to assist in the search, MeSH terms such as burn injury, GLN, and RCT were used. As a result of reviewing the literature, 1112 publications were found. We included only 7 RCTs after implanting our inclusion criteria. There were 328 patients enrolled in the study, with 166 patients (50.61%) were allocated to GLN supplementation and 162 patients in the control groups (49.39%). The risk of infection was significantly lower among patients who received GLN supplementation than those in the control groups (RR = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.92,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.