Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36578327›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Physio-biochemical and molecular stress regulators and their crosstalk for low-temperature stress responses in fruit crops: A review.

Amit Kumar Goswami, Naveen Kumar Maurya, Suneha Goswami, Kirti Bardhan, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Jai Prakash, Satyabrata Pradhan, Amarjeet Kumar, Viswanathan Chinnusamy, Prabhat Kumar and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Oxylipin KODA enhances the early growth of rice (Plant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Amit Kumar GoswamiDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Naveen Kumar MauryaDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Suneha GoswamiDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Kirti BardhanDepartment of Basic Sciences and Humanities, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, India.
Sanjay Kumar SinghDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Jai PrakashDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Satyabrata PradhanDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Amarjeet KumarMulti Testing Technology Centre and Vocational Training Centre, Selesih, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India.
Viswanathan ChinnusamyDivision of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Prabhat KumarDepartment of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi, India.
Radha Mohan SharmaDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Stuti SharmaDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Deepak Singh BishtICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Chavlesh KumarDivision of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Indian Agricultural Research Institute · INCentral Agricultural University · INJawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya · INMinistry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare · INNational Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · INNavsari Agricultural University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-temperature stress (LTS) drastically affects vegetative and reproductive growth in fruit crops leading to a gross reduction in the yield and loss in product quality. Among the fruit crops, temperate fruits, during the period of evolution, have developed the mechanism of tolerance, i.e., adaptive capability to chilling and freezing when exposed to LTS. However, tropical and sub-tropical fruit crops are most vulnerable to LTS. As a result, fruit crops respond to LTS by inducing the expression of LTS related genes, which is for climatic acclimatization. The activation of the stress-responsive gene leads to changes in physiological and biochemical mechanisms such as photosynthesis, chlorophyll biosynthesis, respiration, membrane composition changes, alteration in protein synthesis, increased antioxidant activity, altered levels of metabolites, and signaling pathways that enhance their tolerance/resistance and alleviate the damage caused due to LTS and chilling injury. The gene induction mechanism has been investigated extensively in the model crop Arabidopsis and several winter kinds of cereal. The ICE1 (inducer of C-repeat binding factor expression 1) and the CBF (C-repeat binding factor) transcriptional cascade are involved in transcriptional control. The functions of various CBFs and aquaporin genes were well studied in crop plants and their role in multiple stresses including cold stresses is deciphered. In addition, tissue nutrients and plant growth regulators like ABA, ethylene, jasmonic acid etc., also play a significant role in alleviating the LTS and chilling injury in fruit crops. However, these physiological, biochemical and molecular understanding of LTS tolerance/resistance are restricted to few of the temperate and tropical fruit crops. Therefore, a better understanding of cold tolerance's underlying physio-biochemical and molecular components in fruit crops is required under open and simulated LTS. The understanding of LTS tolerance/resistance mechanism will lay the foundation for tailoring the novel fruit genotypes for successful crop production under erratic weather conditions.

Indexed as

aquaporinsCBFscold tolerancemembrane injuryphytohormonetranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID36578327
PMCPMC9790972
OpenAlexW4312122377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.