Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36578314›Full record

ReviewAllergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.)

Resistant Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria - A Case Series Narrative Review of Treatment Options.

Sujoy Khan, Charu Chopra, Alaistair Mitchell, Alla Nakonechna, Patrick Yong, Mohammed Yousuf Karim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Allergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sujoy KhanDepartment of Immunology & Allergy, Queen's Centre, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5654-2835
Charu ChopraDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Alaistair MitchellDepartment of Dermatology, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, UK.
Alla NakonechnaDepartment of Immunology & Allergy, Queen's Centre, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK.
Patrick YongDepartment of Immunology & Allergy, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, Camberley, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1736-2756
Mohammed Yousuf KarimDepartment of Pathology, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0912-1629
Castle Hill Hospital · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBFrimley Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBVictoria Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can be extremely debilitating to the patient and challenging for the treating clinician. The National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom (UK) recommendation of omalizumab for patients who fail to respond to high-dose anti-histamines has improved treatment options and quality of life. However, there is still lack of clear guidelines for treatment of patients resistant to standard and anti-IgE therapies. Methods: We discuss the therapeutic strategies employed among nine extremely resistant CSU cases and the heterogeneity between guidelines from different societies. Results: Patients with anti-histamine-resistant urticaria either remained on omalizumab or started on immunosuppressive drugs (dapsone or ciclosporin) when they stopped responding to omalizumab. We used clinical assessment, skin biopsies (when available) and previous published reports to consider dapsone (for predominantly neutrophilic infiltration), or ciclosporin at doses between 2 and 4 mg/kg/day. One patient with ciclosporin-resistant urticaria responded to mycophenolate mofetil. Two patients remain on long-term omalizumab due to its relative safety and efficacy including 1 patient with underlying antibody deficiency where omalizumab was preferred over risks of using immunosuppressive medications. Conclusions: These case studies bring to light the real-world difficulties in managing patients with resistant CSU and the need for generating the evidence base on alternative therapeutic options such as synergistic use of biologics and immunosuppressive drugs.

Indexed as

Chronic spontaneous urticariaimmunosuppressive drugsomalizumabresistant urticaria

Identifiers

PMID36578314
PMCPMC9791268
OpenAlexW4312993132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.