ReviewThe Journal of dermatology2023
Significance of anti-desmocollin autoantibodies in pemphigus.
Review in The Journal of dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autoimmune pemphigus: difficulties in diagnosis and the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- A Case Report of Wolf's Post-Herpetic Isotopic Response: Herpetiform Pemphigus.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- High dietary acid load predicts severity of autoimmune skin disease: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Demonstrates a Distinct Autoantibody Profile from Those of Other Autoimmune Blistering Diseases: A Preliminary Study.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Classification and Antigen Molecules of Autoimmune Bullous Diseases.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Significance of anti-desmocollin autoantibodies in pemphigus.The Journal of dermatology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The major autoantigens for pemphigus are desmogleins (Dsgs), cell-cell adhesive structure proteins, one of the desmosomal cadherins. Recent progress in molecular biology has revealed that IgG autoantibodies of classical pemphigus react with Dsg1 or Dsg3. Desmocollins (Dscs) also belong to the cadherin supergene family that provides structure to the desmosomes and play an important role in cell-to-cell adhesion. In addition to the presence of four desmosomal Dsg isoforms, i.e. Dsg1-4, Dsc1, 2 and 3, all of which are derived from different genes, Dsc1 has been previously identified as the target antigen of IgA autoantibodies in the subcorneal pustular dermatosis (SPD)-type of intercellular IgA dermatosis. In addition to the IgA anti-Dsc1 autoantiboides, the presence of IgG anti-Dsc autoantibodies is described in patients of some autoimmune bullous diseases. In particular, the current pemphigus detecting autoantibodies to Dscs has shown a tendency in atypical variants of pemphigus. Therefore, autoantibodies against Dscs alone may cause detachment of cell-cell adhesion in the epidermis in some pemphigus. However, except for the findings of a few in vitro and in vivo studies, there is currently no clear evidence for the pathogenicity of anti-Dsc autoantibodies in pemphigus, whereas significance of anti-Dsg autoantibodies is well established. This article describes the structure and function of the Dscs, and explores the evidence regarding the pathogenic role of anti-Dsc autoantibodies in pemphigus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.