Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36578030›Full record

Trial reportTrials2022

Pneumococcal vaccine schedules (PVS) study: a cluster-randomised, non-inferiority trial of an alternative versus standard schedule for pneumococcal conjugate vaccination-statistical analysis plan.

Grant A Mackenzie, Arto A Palmu, Jukka Jokinen, Isaac Osei, Stefan Flasche, Brian Greenwood, Kim Mulholland, Cattram Nguyen

Abstract readEquivalence TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Grant A MackenzieMRC Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia. gmackenzie@mrc.gm.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-2627
Arto A PalmuFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Jukka JokinenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Isaac OseiMRC Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Stefan FlascheFaculty of Epidemiology & Public Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Brian GreenwoodFaculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kim MulhollandInfection & Immunity Theme, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Cattram NguyenInfection & Immunity Theme, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/R006121/1Medical Research Council MR_R006121-1Medical Research Council MR/V011626/1Wellcome Trust 208812/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe effectiveness of universal immunisation with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) has been evident in many countries. However, the global impact of PCV is limited by its cost, which has prevented its introduction in several countries. Reducing the cost of PCV programmes may facilitate vaccine introduction in some countries and improve the sustainability of PCV in EPIs in low-income countries when they transition away from subsidised vaccine supply. METHODS AND

designPVS is a real-world field trial of an alternative schedule of one dose of PCV scheduled at age 6 weeks with a booster dose at age 9 months (i.e. the alternative '1+1' schedule) compared to the standard schedule of three primary doses scheduled at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age (i.e. the standard '3+0' schedule). Delivery of the interventions began in late 2019 in 68 geographic clusters and will continue for 4 years. The primary endpoint is the prevalence of nasopharyngeal vaccine-type pneumococcal carriage in children aged 2-260 weeks with clinical pneumonia in year 4. Secondary endpoints are the prevalence of vaccine-type pneumococcal carriage among all ages in year 4 and the incidence of radiological pneumonia in children enrolled to receive the interventions. Additional disease and carriage endpoints are included. PURPOSE: This statistical analysis plan (SAP) describes the cohorts and populations, and follow-up criteria, to be used in different analyses. The SAP defines the endpoints and describes how adherence to the interventions will be presented. We describe how analyses will account for the effect of clustering and stratified randomisation. The SAP defines the approach to non-inferiority and other analyses. Defining the SAP early in the trial will avoid bias in analyses that may arise from prior knowledge of trial findings.

Indexed as

Pneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesChild, PreschoolHumansImmunization ScheduleInfantInfant, NewbornStreptococcus pneumoniaeVaccinationVaccines, ConjugatePneumococcal VaccinesVaccines, ConjugateCluster-randomisedPneumococcalScheduleStatistical analysis planVaccine

Identifiers

PMID36578030
PMCPMC9798555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.