ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022
Association of labor epidural analgesia use with exclusive breastfeeding up to six months: a online-based cross sectional survey in Jiaxing, China.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Occurrence and Factors Associated with Overt Urinary Retention Among Postpartum Women After Vaginal Delivery with Labor Epidural Analgesia.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of labor epidural analgesia (LEA) on breastfeeding remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between LEA use and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) up to 6 months.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional survey on healthy mothers who had vaginal delivery with infants aged 7-12 months from seven maternal health WeChat groups in Jiaxing, China. Data including EBF status up to 6 months, maternal sociodemographic characteristics, LEA use in labor, breastfeeding supports during hospitalization and reasons for stopping EBF were collected using online self-administered questionnaires in October 2021. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine the potential association of LEA use with EBF up to 6 months by the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
resultsOf a total of 537 surveyed mothers, 408 (76.0%) delivered with LEA and 398 (74.1%) exclusively breastfed their infants until 6 months. All mothers delivered in the hospitals with active breastfeeding policies. There was no statistical difference in the rate of EBF up to 6 months between mothers with and without LEA (73.8% versus 75.2%, P = 0.748). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that only increased maternal age (AOR = 0.906, 95% CI 0.854-0.961, P = 0.001) and perceived insufficient breast milk (AOR = 0.129, 95% CI 0.082-0.204, P < 0.001) were associated with lower odds of EBF up to 6 months. The top three reasons for non-EBF were no or insufficient breast milk (41.7%), inability to breastfeed infants after return to work (27.3%), and maternal related factors (24.4%).
conclusionsLEA does not affect EBF up to 6 months. Other factors such as health education and breastfeeding-friendly hospital strategies may be much more important to breastfeeding outcomes compared to LEA use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.