Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36578018›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2022

Different coatings on magnetic nanoparticles dictate their degradation kinetics in vivo for 15 months after intravenous administration in mice.

Yadileiny Portilla, Yilian Fernández-Afonso, Sonia Pérez-Yagüe, Vladimir Mulens-Arias, M Puerto Morales, Lucía Gutiérrez, Domingo F Barber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yadileiny Portilla *Department of Immunology and Oncology and the NanoBiomedicine Initiative, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB)/CSIC, Darwin 3, Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2738-0384
Yilian Fernández-Afonso *Departamento de Química Analítica, Instituto de Nanociencia Y Materiales de Aragón (INMA), Universidad de Zaragoza, CSIC and CIBER-BBN, 50018, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0970-1917
Sonia Pérez-YagüeDepartment of Immunology and Oncology and the NanoBiomedicine Initiative, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB)/CSIC, Darwin 3, Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5593-8774
Vladimir Mulens-AriasDepartment of Immunology and Oncology and the NanoBiomedicine Initiative, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB)/CSIC, Darwin 3, Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-3039
M Puerto MoralesDepartment of Energy, Environment and Health, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM-CSIC), Sor Juana Inés de La Cruz 3, 28049, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7290-7029
Lucía GutiérrezDepartamento de Química Analítica, Instituto de Nanociencia Y Materiales de Aragón (INMA), Universidad de Zaragoza, CSIC and CIBER-BBN, 50018, Zaragoza, Spain. lu@unizar.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2366-3598
Domingo F BarberDepartment of Immunology and Oncology and the NanoBiomedicine Initiative, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB)/CSIC, Darwin 3, Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain. dfbarber@cnb.csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-5405
Centro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESInstituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ES

Funding

MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 IJCI-2017-31447MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2020-112685RB-100MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF a way of making Europe PGC2018-096016-B-I00MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF a way of making Europe SAF2017-82223-RMCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the ESF Investing in your future FPU15/06170MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the ESF Investing in your future RYC-2014-15512,Santander-Universidad Zaragoza Fellowship program for funding her PhD position PhD position
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe surface coating of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticle (MNPs) drives their intracellular trafficking and degradation in endolysosomes, as well as dictating other cellular outcomes. As such, we assessed whether MNP coatings might influence their biodistribution, their accumulation in certain organs and their turnover therein, processes that must be understood in vivo to optimize the design of nanoformulations for specific therapeutic/diagnostic needs.

resultsIn this study, three different MNP coatings were analyzed, each conferring the identical 12 nm iron oxide cores with different physicochemical characteristics: 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane (APS), dextran (DEX), and dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). When the biodistribution of these MNPs was analyzed in C57BL/6 mice, they all mainly accumulated in the spleen and liver one week after administration. The coating influenced the proportion of the MNPs in each organ, with more APS-MNPs accumulating in the spleen and more DMSA-MNPs accumulating in the liver, remaining there until they were fully degraded. The changes in the physicochemical properties of the MNPs (core size and magnetic properties) was also assessed during their intracellular degradation when internalized by two murine macrophage cell lines. The decrease in the size of the MNPs iron core was influenced by their coating and the organ in which they accumulated. Finally, MNP degradation was analyzed in the liver and spleen of C57BL/6 mice from 7 days to 15 months after the last intravenous MNP administration.

conclusionsThe MNPs degraded at different rates depending on the organ and their coating, the former representing the feature that was fundamental in determining the time they persisted. In the liver, the rate of degradation was similar for all three coatings, and it was faster than in the spleen. This information regarding the influence of coatings on the in vivo degradation of MNPs will help to choose the best coating for each biomedical application depending on the specific clinical requirements.

Indexed as

Magnetite NanoparticlesNanoparticlesAdministration, IntravenousAnimalsFerric CompoundsKineticsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSuccimerTissue DistributionFerric Compoundsferric oxideMagnetite NanoparticlesSuccimerBiodegradationBiodistributionBiotransformationIron oxide nanoparticleSurface coating

Identifiers

PMID36578018
PMCPMC9795732
OpenAlexW4313340271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.