Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36577958›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2022

Neoadjuvant docetaxel and capecitabine (TX) versus docetaxel and epirubicin (TE) for locally advanced or early her2-negative breast cancer: an open-label, randomized, multi-center, phase II Trial.

Houpu Yang, Ling Xu, Shan Guan, Xiaopeng Hao, Zhicheng Ge, Fuzhong Tong, Yingming Cao, Peng Liu, Bo Zhou, Lin Cheng and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Houpu YangPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Ling XuBreast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shan GuanDepartment of Breast Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaopeng HaoDepartment of General Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhicheng GeDepartment of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fuzhong TongPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Yingming CaoPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Peng LiuPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Bo ZhouPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Lin ChengPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Miao LiuPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Hongjun LiuPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Fei XiePeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Siyuan WangPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Yuan PengPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Chaobin WangPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China.
Shu WangPeking University People's Hospital Breast Center, Beijing, China. shuwang@pkuph.edu.cn.
Peking University · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CNBeijing Friendship Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe combination of taxanes and anthracyclines is still the mainstay of chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Capecitabine is an active drug with a favorable toxicity profile, showing strong anti-tumor activity against metastatic breast cancer. This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of the TX regimen (docetaxel and capecitabine) and compared it with the TE (docetaxel and epirubicin) regimen in locally advanced or high risk early HER2-negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis randomized clinical trial was conducted at five academic centers in China. Eligible female patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the TX (docetaxel 75 mg/m

resultsBetween September 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, 113 HER2-negative patients were randomly assigned to the study groups (TX: n = 54; TE: n = 59). In the primary endpoint analysis, 14 patients in the TX group achieved a pCR, and nine patients in the TE group achieved a pCR (25.9% vs. 15.3%), with a not significant difference of 10.6% (95% CI -6.0-27.3%; P = 0.241). In a subgroup with high Ki-67 score, TX increased the pCR rate by 24.2% (95% CI 2.2-46.1%; P = 0.029). At the end of the 69-month median follow-up period, both groups had equivalent iDFS and OS rates. TX was associated with a higher incidence of hand-foot syndrome and less alopecia, with a manageable toxicity profile.

conclusionThe anthracycline-free TX regimen yielded comparable pCR and long-term survival rates to the TE regimen. Thus, this anthracycline-free regimen could be considered in selected patients.

trial registrationACTRN12613000206729 on 21/02/2013, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineCyclophosphamideDocetaxelEpirubicinFemaleFluorouracilHumansTreatment OutcomeAnthracyclinesCapecitabineCyclophosphamideDocetaxelEpirubicinFluorouracilAnthracyclineBreast neoplasmsCapecitabineNeoadjuvant therapyTaxane

Identifiers

PMID36577958
PMCPMC9795638
OpenAlexW4313417261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.