Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36577865›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Survival After Breast-Conserving Surgery Compared with that After Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Sungchan Gwark, Hwa Jung Kim, Jisun Kim, Il Yong Chung, Hee Jeong Kim, Beom Seok Ko, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, Sei Hyun Ahn, Sae Byul Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sungchan GwarkDepartment of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hwa Jung KimDepartment of Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jisun KimDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Il Yong ChungDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hee Jeong KimDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Beom Seok KoDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jong Won LeeDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Byung Ho SonDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sei Hyun AhnDepartment of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Sae Byul LeeDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. newstar153@hanmail.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3370-6937
Ulsan College · KREwha Womans University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast-conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy (BCS + RT) has been shown to improve survival compared with mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer; however, whether this superiority is maintained in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is unclear. We evaluated and compared the survival outcomes after BCS + RT and mastectomy in Korean women with breast cancer treated with NCT.

methodsWe evaluated 1641 patients who received NCT before surgery (BCS or mastectomy). We performed propensity score matching to minimize potential bias due to factors other than the surgical method and compared the 5-year, disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) rates before and after exact matching.

resultsAmong the 1641 patients, 839 (51.1%) underwent BCS + RT and 802 (48.9%) underwent mastectomy. Patients who underwent mastectomy had larger tumors and more frequently had positive nodes. For BCS+RT and mastectomy, the unadjusted 5-year DFS, 5-year DMFS, and 5-year OS rates were 87.0% and 73.1%, 89.5% and 77.0%, and 91.8% and 81.0%, respectively (all p < 0.05 = 0.000). After PSM, 5-year DFS, 5-year DMFS, and 5-year OS rates for BCS + RT and mastectomy were 87.6% and 69.1%, 89.7% and 76.0%, and 89.1% and 75.7%, respectively (all p < 0.05). In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses accounting for various confounding factors, BCS + RT was significantly associated with improved DFS (p < 0.05), DMFS (p < 0.05), and OS (p < 0.05) rates compared with mastectomy.

conclusionsBCS + RT does not impair DFS and OS in patients treated with NCT. Tumor biology and treatment response are significant prognostic indicators. Our results suggest that BCS + RT may be preferred in most breast cancer patients when both BCS and mastectomy are suitable.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, Adjuvant

Identifiers

PMID36577865
OpenAlexW4313204144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.