Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36577764›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Coumarin biosynthesis genes are required after foliar pathogen infection for the creation of a microbial soil-borne legacy that primes plants for SA-dependent defenses.

Gilles Vismans, Sietske van Bentum, Jelle Spooren, Yang Song, Pim Goossens, Josep Valls, Basten L Snoek, Benjamin Thiombiano, Mario Schilder, Lemeng Dong and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Root colonization by beneficial rhizobacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Microbiome responses to naturalPlant and soil · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gilles Vismans *Department of Biology, Science4Life, Plant-Microbe Interactions, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, 3508 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Sietske van Bentum *Department of Biology, Science4Life, Plant-Microbe Interactions, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, 3508 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jelle Spooren *Department of Biology, Science4Life, Plant-Microbe Interactions, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, 3508 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Yang Song *Department of Biology, Science4Life, Plant-Microbe Interactions, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, 3508 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Pim GoossensDepartment of Biology, Science4Life, Plant-Microbe Interactions, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, 3508 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Josep VallsUniv. Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR 1366 OENO - Axe Molécules À Intérêt Biologique, ISVV, 33140, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Basten L SnoekDepartment of Biology, Science4, Life Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Biodynamics and Biocomplexity, Utrecht University, 3508 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Benjamin ThiombianoPlant Hormone Biology Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1000 BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mario SchilderPlant Hormone Biology Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1000 BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lemeng DongPlant Hormone Biology Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1000 BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Harro J BouwmeesterPlant Hormone Biology Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1000 BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pierre PétriacqUniversité de Bordeaux, INRAE, UMR1332 Biologie du Fruit et Pathology, 33882, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Corné M J PieterseDepartment of Biology, Science4Life, Plant-Microbe Interactions, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, 3508 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Peter A H M BakkerDepartment of Biology, Science4Life, Plant-Microbe Interactions, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, 3508 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Roeland L BerendsenDepartment of Biology, Science4Life, Plant-Microbe Interactions, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, 3508 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands. r.l.berendsen@uu.nl.
Utrecht University · NLNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants deposit photosynthetically-fixed carbon in the rhizosphere, the thin soil layer directly around the root, thereby creating a hospitable environment for microbes. To manage the inhabitants of this nutrient-rich environment, plant roots exude and dynamically adjust microbe-attracting and -repelling compounds to stimulate specific members of the microbiome. Previously, we demonstrated that foliar infection of Arabidopsis thaliana by the biotrophic downy mildew pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (Hpa) leads to a disease-induced modification of the rhizosphere microbiome. Soil conditioned with Hpa-infected plants provided enhanced protection against foliar downy mildew infection in a subsequent population of plants, a phenomenon dubbed the soil-borne legacy (SBL). Here, we show that for the creation of the SBL, plant-produced coumarins play a prominent role as coumarin-deficient myb72 and f6'h1 mutants were defective in creating a Hpa-induced SBL. Root exudation profiles changed significantly in Col-0 upon foliar Hpa infection, and this was accompanied by a compositional shift in the root microbiome that was significantly different from microbial shifts occurring on roots of Hpa-infected coumarin-deficient mutants. Our data further show that the Hpa-induced SBL primes Col-0 plants growing in SBL-conditioned soil for salicylic acid (SA)-dependent defenses. The SA-signaling mutants sid2 and npr1 were unresponsive to the Hpa-induced SBL, suggesting that the protective effect of the Hpa-induced shift in the root microbiome results from an induced systemic resistance that requires SA-signaling in the plant.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsOomycetesPeronosporaCoumarinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant DiseasesSalicylic AcidArabidopsis ProteinsCoumarinsSalicylic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36577764
PMCPMC9797477
OpenAlexW4313379950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.