Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36577223›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2023

From delta to omicron: The role of individual factors and social context in self-reported compliance with pandemic regulations and recommendations.

Philipp Sprengholz, Robert Bruckmann, Marc Wiedermann, Dirk Brockmann, Cornelia Betsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philipp SprengholzMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany; Health Communication, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany; Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: philipp.sprengholz@uni-erfurt.de.
Robert BruckmannMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany; Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Marc WiedermannRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Biology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dirk BrockmannRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany; Institute for Biology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Cornelia BetschMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany; Health Communication, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As SARS-CoV-2 spreads especially when larger groups gather (e.g., at the workplace), it is crucial to understand compliance with regulations and recommendations in such settings. Using data from adults in Germany (N = 29,355) assessed between October 2021 and February 2022, we investigated factors associated with self-reported compliance in both private and working life and how these relate to each other. The results indicate that private compliance was stronger among older individuals and females; among those who worried more about the pandemic situation and assumed that infection was more severe; among those who trusted the government more; and among those who did not perceive public health measures as exaggerated. Private compliance was also associated with personality traits; in particular, individuals who followed regulations and recommendations were likely to be more introverted, conscientious, open, and agreeable. Compliance at work related to both private compliance and colleagues' behaviors. Individuals whose private compliance was high also complied at work. However, when private compliance was low, compliance at work aligned with colleagues' behaviors; that is, compliance at work was high when colleagues complied and low when they did not. The observed effects were stable over time. In summary, they suggest that compliance with regulations and recommendations depends on individual risk perception, trust in government, perception of required or recommended measures, and social norms. To promote protective behaviors in contexts where larger groups gather (including workplaces), making positive social norms more salient (e.g., by supporting role models) may prove especially useful.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultFemaleHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Self ReportSocial EnvironmentComplianceCOVID-19Organizational behaviorSocial normsWorkplace behaviorWork safety

Identifiers

PMID36577223
PMCPMC9783191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.