Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36577203›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2023

Assess the documentation of cognitive tests and biomarkers in electronic health records via natural language processing for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

Zhaoyi Chen, Hansi Zhang, Xi Yang, Songzi Wu, Xing He, Jie Xu, Jingchuan Guo, Mattia Prosperi, Fei Wang, Hua Xu and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the Effect of Eligibility Criteria on AD Severity and Severe Adverse Event in Eligible Patients.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhaoyi ChenDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Hansi ZhangDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Xi YangDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Songzi WuDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Xing HeDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jie XuDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jingchuan GuoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Mattia ProsperiDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Fei WangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Hua XuCenter for Translational AI in Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Yong ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hui HuChanning Division of Network Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Steven T DeKoskyDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Matthew FarrerDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Yi GuoDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Yonghui WuDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address: Yonghui.wu@ufl.edu.
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address: bianjiang@ufl.edu.
University of Florida Health · USUniversity of Florida · USCornell University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Computational Drug Repurposing for AD/ADRD with Integrative Analysis of Real World Data and Biomedical KnowledgeR01AG076234 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Jiang Bian, Fei Wang · 2022 to 2026
$3.8M
Advancing Drug Repositioning for Alzheimer’s Disease using Real-world DataR56AG069880 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, CHEN, YONG · 2021 to 2022
$1.6M
Optimizing the Population Representativeness of Older Adults in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Clinical TrialsR21AG068717 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2021
$419k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076234NIA NIH HHS R21 AG068717NIA NIH HHS R56 AG069880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive tests and biomarkers are the key information to assess the severity and track the progression of Alzheimer's' disease (AD) and AD-related dementias (AD/ADRD), yet, both are often only documented in clinical narratives of patients' electronic health records (EHRs). In this work, we aim to (1) assess the documentation of cognitive tests and biomarkers in EHRs that can be used as real-world endpoints, and (2) identify, extract, and harmonize the different commonly used cognitive tests from clinical narratives using natural language processing (NLP) methods into categorical AD/ADRD severity.

methodsWe developed a rule-based NLP pipeline to extract the cognitive tests and biomarkers from clinical narratives in AD/ADRD patients' EHRs. We aggregated the extracted results to the patient level and harmonized the cognitive test scores into severity categories using cutoffs determined based on both relevant literature and domain knowledge of AD/ADRD clinicians.

resultsWe identified an AD/ADRD cohort of 48,912 patients from the University of Florida (UF) Health system and identified 7 measurements (6 cognitive tests and 1 biomarker) that are frequently documented in our data. Our NLP pipeline achieved an overall F1-score of 0.9059 across the 7 measurements. Among the 6 cognitive tests, we were able to harmonize 4 cognitive test scores into severity categories, and the population characteristics of patients with different severity were described. We also identified several factors related to the availability of their documentation in EHRs.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that our NLP pipelines can extract cognitive tests and biomarkers of AD/ADRD accurately for downstream studies. Although, the documentation of cognitive tests and biomarkers in EHRs appears to be low, RWD is still an important resource for AD/ADRD research. Nevertheless, providing standardized approach to document cognitive tests and biomarkers in EHRS are also warranted.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersCognitionDocumentationElectronic Health RecordsMental Status and Dementia TestsNatural Language ProcessingAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient AcuityBiomarkersAlzheimer’s Disease and Related DementiasCognitive TestsNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID36577203
PMCPMC11325083
OpenAlexW4312058793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.