ArticlePloS one2022
Identification of COVID-19 spread mechanisms based on first-wave data, simulation models, and evolutionary algorithms.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 epidemic has shown that efficient prediction models are required, and the well-known SI, SIR, and SEIR models are not always capable of capturing the real dynamics. Modified models with novel structures could help identify unknown mechanisms of COVID-19 spread.
objectiveOur objective is to provide additional insights into the COVID-19 spread mechanisms based on different models' parameterization which was performed using evolutionary algorithms and the first-wave data.
methodsData from the Our World in Data COVID-19 database was analysed, and several models-SI, SIR, SEIR, SEIUR, and Bass diffusion-and their variations were considered for the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The models' parameters were tuned with differential evolution optimization method L-SHADE to find the best fit. The algorithm for the automatic identification of the first wave was developed, and the differential evolution was applied to model parameterization. The reproduction rates (R0) for the first wave were calculated for 61 countries based on the best fits.
resultsThe performed experiments showed that the Bass diffusion model-based modification could be superior compared to SI, SIR, SEIR and SEIUR due to the component responsible for spread from an external factor, which is not directly dependent on contact with infected individuals. The developed modified models containing this component were shown to perform better when fitting to the first-wave cumulative infections curve. In particular, the modified SEIR model was better fitted to the real-world data than the classical SEIR in 43 cases out of 61, based on Mann-Whitney U tests; the Bass diffusion model was better than SI for 57 countries. This showed the limitation of the classical models and indicated ways to improve them.
conclusionsBy using the modified models, the mechanism of infection spread, which is not directly dependent on contacts, was identified, which significantly influences the dynamics of the spread of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.