ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023
Feasibility study of deep learning-based markerless real-time lung tumor tracking with orthogonal X-ray projection images.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A new perspective on radiotherapy in the comprehensive treatment of cancer.Precision radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Fluoroscopy-Guided Motion Management in Particle Therapy: Evolution, Challenges, and AI-Enabled Opportunities.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Review
- Feasibility of markerless real-time tumor tracking volumetric modulated arc therapy using diaphragm-based respiratory offset vectors.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Marker-Less Lung Tumor Tracking from Real-Time Color X-Ray Fluoroscopic Images Using Cross-Patient Deep Learning Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence in Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Medical Imaging.Cureus · 2025Review
- Data-Driven Volumetric Computed Tomography Image Generation From Surface Structures Using a Patient-Specific Deep Leaning Model.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-based motion tracking in cancer radiotherapy: A review.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Review
- Deep learning-based target decomposition for markerless lung tumor tracking in radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based target tracking with X-ray images for radiotherapy: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing radiation therapy: the role of AI in clinical practice.Journal of radiation research · 2024Review
- Feasibility study of deep learning-based markerless real-time lung tumor tracking with orthogonal X-ray projection images.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe feasibility of a deep learning-based markerless real-time tumor tracking (RTTT) method was retrospectively studied with orthogonal kV X-ray images and clinical tracking records acquired during lung cancer treatment.
methodsTen patients with lung cancer treated with marker-implanted RTTT were included. The prescription dose was 50 Gy in four fractions, using seven- to nine-port non-coplanar static beams. This corresponds to 14-18 X-ray tube angles for an orthogonal X-ray imaging system rotating with the gantry. All patients underwent 10 respiratory phases four-dimensional computed tomography. After a data augmentation approach, for each X-ray tube angle of a patient, 2250 digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) images with gross tumor volume (GTV) contour labeled were obtained. These images were adopted to train the patient and X-ray tube angle-specific GTV contour prediction model. During the testing, the model trained with DRR images predicted GTV contour on X-ray projection images acquired during treatment. The predicted three-dimensional (3D) positions of the GTV were calculated based on the centroids of the contours in the orthogonal images. The 3D positions of GTV determined by the marker-implanted RTTT during the treatment were considered as the ground truth. The 3D deviations between the prediction and the ground truth were calculated to evaluate the performance of the model.
resultsThe median GTV volume and motion range were 7.42 (range, 1.18-25.74) cm
conclusionsThe evaluation results and calculation efficiency show the proposed deep learning-based markerless RTTT method may be feasible for patients with lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.