Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36576748›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2022

Transducin-Deficient Rod Photoreceptors Evaluated With Optical Coherence Tomography and Oxygen Consumption Rate Energy Biomarkers.

Bruce A Berkowitz, Robert H Podolsky, Karen Lins Childers, Robin Roberts, Ryan Katz, Rida Waseem, Brian M Robbings, Daniel T Hass, James B Hurley, Ian R Sweet and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Surviving, Not Thriving, Photoreceptors in Patients withDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Bruce A BerkowitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Visual and Anatomical Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Robert H PodolskyBiostatistics and Study Methodology, Children's National Hospital, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States.
Karen Lins ChildersBeaumont Research Institute, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, United States.
Robin RobertsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Visual and Anatomical Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Ryan KatzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Visual and Anatomical Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Rida WaseemDepartment of Ophthalmology, Visual and Anatomical Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Brian M RobbingsDepartment of Biochemistry, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Daniel T HassDepartment of Biochemistry, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
James B HurleyDepartment of Biochemistry, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Ian R SweetDepartment of Medicine, UW Medicine Diabetes Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Cole GoodmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Visual and Anatomical Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Haohua QianVisual Function Core, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Bruno AlvisioOSIO Bioinformatics Core, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Sam HeapsOSIO Bioinformatics Core, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Wayne State University · USUniversity of Washington · USNational Eye Institute · USBeaumont Health · USChildren's National · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that rod energy biomarkers in light and dark are similar in mice without functional rod transducin (Gnat1rd17). Methods: Gnat1rd17 and wildtype (WT) mice were studied in canonically low energy demand (light) and high energy demand (dark) conditions. We measured rod inner segment ellipsoid zone (ISez) profile shape, external limiting membrane-retinal pigment epithelium (ELM-RPE) thickness, and magnitude of a hyporeflective band (HB) intensity dip located between photoreceptor tips and apical RPE; antioxidants were given in a subset of mice. Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and visual performance indexes were also measured. Results: The lower energy demand expected in light-adapted wildtype retinas was associated with an elongated ISez, thicker ELM-RPE, and higher HB magnitude, and lower OCR compared to high energy demand conditions in the dark. Gnat1rd17 mice showed a wildtype-like ISez profile shape at 20 minutes of light that became rounder at 60 minutes; at both times, ELM-RPE was smaller than wildtype values, and the HB magnitude was unmeasurable. OCR was higher than in the dark. Light-adapted Gnat1rd17 mice biomarkers were unaffected by anti-oxidants. Gnat1rd17 mice showed modest outer nuclear layer thinning and no reduction in visual performance indexes. Conclusions: Light-stimulated changes in all biomarkers in WT mice are consistent with the established light-induced decrease in net energy demand. In contrast, biomarker changes in Gnat1rd17 mice raise the possibility that light increases net energy demand in the absence of rod phototransduction.

Indexed as

Tomography, Optical CoherenceTransducinAnimalsBiomarkersMiceRetinaRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsBiomarkersTransducin

Identifiers

PMID36576748
PMCPMC9804021
OpenAlexW4312225791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.