Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36576736›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Model to Predict Lung Cancer Risk Using Chest Radiographs and Electronic Medical Record Data.

Vineet K Raghu, Anika S Walia, Aniket N Zinzuwadia, Reece J Goiffon, Jo-Anne O Shepard, Hugo J W L Aerts, Inga T Lennes, Michael T Lu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06910956 (Deep Learning Using Routine Chest X-Rays and Electronic Medical Record Data to Identify High Risk Patients for Lung Cancer Screening CT), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06910956 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Deep Learning Using Routine Chest X-Rays and Electronic Medical Record Data to Identify High Risk Patients for Lung Cancer Screening CT

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled1,500ConditionsLung Cancer, Health Screening, Early Cancer Detection, Deep LearningArmsCXR-LC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Current trends and future directions of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Awaiting the support of artificial intelligence in lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vineet K RaghuCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anika S WaliaCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aniket N ZinzuwadiaCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Reece J GoiffonDivision of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jo-Anne O ShepardDivision of Thoracic Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hugo J W L AertsCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Inga T LennesDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael T LuCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Lung cancer screening with chest computed tomography (CT) prevents lung cancer death; however, fewer than 5% of eligible Americans are screened. CXR-LC, an open-source deep learning tool that estimates lung cancer risk from existing chest radiograph images and commonly available electronic medical record (EMR) data, may enable automated identification of high-risk patients as a step toward improving lung cancer screening participation. Objective: To validate CXR-LC using EMR data to identify individuals at high-risk for lung cancer to complement 2022 US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) lung cancer screening eligibility guidelines. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study compared CXR-LC estimates with CMS screening guidelines using patient data from a large US hospital system. Included participants were persons who currently or formerly smoked cigarettes with an outpatient posterior-anterior chest radiograph between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014, with no history of lung cancer or screening CT. Data analysis was performed between May 2021 and June 2022. Exposures: CXR-LC lung cancer screening eligibility (previously defined as having a 3.297% or greater 12-year risk) based on inputs (chest radiograph image, age, sex, and whether currently smoking) extracted from the EMR. Main Outcomes and Measures: 6-year incident lung cancer. Results: A total of 14 737 persons were included in the study population (mean [SD] age, 62.6 [6.8] years; 7154 [48.5%] male; 204 [1.4%] Asian, 1051 [7.3%] Black, 432 [2.9%] Hispanic, 12 330 [85.2%] White) with a 2.4% rate of incident lung cancer over 6 years (361 patients with cancer). CMS eligibility could be determined in 6277 patients (42.6%) using smoking pack-year and quit-date from the EMR. Patients eligible by both CXR-LC and 2022 CMS criteria had a high rate of lung cancer (83 of 974 patients [8.5%]), higher than those eligible by 2022 CMS criteria alone (5 of 177 patients [2.8%]; P < .001). Patients eligible by CXR-LC but not 2022 CMS criteria also had a high 6-year incidence of lung cancer (121 of 3703 [3.3%]). In the 8460 cases (57.4%) where CMS eligibility was unknown, CXR-LC eligible patients had a 5-fold higher rate of lung cancer than ineligible (127 of 5177 [2.5%] vs 18 of 2283 [0.5%]; P < .001). Similar results were found in subgroups, including female patients and Black persons. Conclusions and Relevance: Using routine chest radiographs and other data automatically extracted from the EMR, CXR-LC identified high-risk individuals who may benefit from lung cancer screening CT.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsAgedEarly Detection of CancerElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36576736
PMCPMC9857639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.