ReviewNeuropsychology review2024
Variability in Hemispheric Functional Segregation Phenotypes: A Review and General Mechanistic Model.
Review in Neuropsychology review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hemispheric asymmetries in rodent models of neurological diseases: a systematic review.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- The Emergence of Topography and Hemispheric Lateralization in High-Level Vision.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026Review
- Hemispheric segregation is evident in early perception, not just higher cognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound neuromodulation of the amygdala: is left always right?Molecular psychiatry · 2025Article
- The Balance in the Head: How Developmental Factors Explain Relationships Between Brain Asymmetries and Mental Diseases.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Effects of Lateralization of Language on Cognition Among Left-Handers.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Atypical lateralization of visuospatial attention can be associated with better or worse performance on line bisection.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Motor-sensory biases are associated with cognitive and social abilities in humans.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Clinical implications of brain asymmetries.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024Review
- Atlas for the Lateralized Visuospatial Attention Networks (ALANs): Insights from fMRI and network analyses.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Language network lateralization is reflected throughout the macroscale functional organization of cortex.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Many functions of the human brain are organized asymmetrically and are subject to strong population biases. Some tasks, like speaking and making complex hand movements, exhibit left hemispheric dominance, whereas others, such as spatial processing and recognizing faces, favor the right hemisphere. While pattern of preference implies the existence of a stereotypical way of distributing functions between the hemispheres, an ever-increasing body of evidence indicates that not everyone follows this pattern of hemispheric functional segregation. On the contrary, the review conducted in this article shows that departures from the standard hemispheric division of labor are routinely observed and assume many distinct forms, each having a different prevalence rate. One of the key challenges in human neuroscience is to model this variability. By integrating well-established and recently emerged ideas about the mechanisms that underlie functional lateralization, the current article proposes a general mechanistic model that explains the observed distribution of segregation phenotypes and generates new testable hypotheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36576683What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.