Observational studyArchives of osteoporosis2022
Adoption of telemedicine care for osteoporotic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.
Observational study in Archives of osteoporosis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of telemedicine care provided to osteoporotic patients in Saudi Arabia. Our results show that this service was effective and feasible, and patients had a good rate of satisfaction with it. PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and feasibility of telemedicine care in osteoporotic patients during the COVID-19 lockdown period in Saudi Arabia compared to in-person patients, as well as their satisfaction with this service.
methodsThis observational retrospective study was conducted between March 2021 and September 2021 in King Saud University Medical City, Saudi Arabia. A survey was used to compare patients attending telemedicine clinics with in-person patients in terms of access and adherence to medications, occurrence of new fractures, and overall satisfaction with this service.
results195 patients attended the telemedicine clinic, while 63 attended the in-person clinic. Exercise frequency was similar in both groups, although exercise intensity was greater in the in-person group. 25(OH)D levels were stable in both groups. The availability and delay of supply of osteoporosis medications were not statistically different between both groups while adherence to treatment did not differ significantly between the two groups. The majority of patients in the telemedicine group were satisfied.
conclusionsTelemedicine care was feasible and effective in managing osteoporotic patients during the COVID-19 epidemic. Such service could be considered in the future for managing disabled patients and those living in remote areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.