Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36576585›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2023

A Systematic and Universal Artificial Intelligence Screening Method for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: Improving Diagnosis Through Risk Management.

Alberto Martin-Martinez, Jaume Miró, Cristina Amadó, Francisco Ruz, Antonio Ruiz, Omar Ortega, Pere Clavé

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. An introduction to machine learning and generative artificial intelligence for otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons: a narrative review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto Martin-MartinezGastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, CIBERehd CSdM-UAB, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carretera de Cirera 230, 08304, Mataró, Spain. amartinma@csdm.cat.
Jaume MiróGastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, CIBERehd CSdM-UAB, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carretera de Cirera 230, 08304, Mataró, Spain.
Cristina AmadóGastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, CIBERehd CSdM-UAB, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carretera de Cirera 230, 08304, Mataró, Spain.
Francisco RuzIT Department, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Mataró, Spain.
Antonio RuizIT Department, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Mataró, Spain.
Omar OrtegaGastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, CIBERehd CSdM-UAB, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carretera de Cirera 230, 08304, Mataró, Spain.
Pere ClavéGastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, CIBERehd CSdM-UAB, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carretera de Cirera 230, 08304, Mataró, Spain. pere.clave@ciberehd.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0696-8560
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESMaresme Health Consortium · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas · ES

Funding

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas EHD20PI02_2020Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya (PRE/161/2019)Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya SLT017/10/000219"la Caixa" Foundation (CI20-00158)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is underdiagnosed and current screening is costly. We aimed: (a) to develop an expert system (ES) based on machine learning that calculates the risk of OD from the electronic health records (EHR) of all hospitalized older patients during admission, and (b) to implement the ES in a general hospital. In an observational, retrospective study, EHR and swallowing assessment using the volume-viscosity swallow test for OD were captured over 24 months in patients > 70 yr admitted to Mataró Hospital. We studied the predictive power for OD of 25,000 variables. ES was obtained using feature selection, the final prediction model was built with non-linear methods (Random Forest). The database included 2809 older patients (mean age 82.47 ± 9.33 yr), severely dependent (Barthel Index 47.68 ± 31.90), with multiple readmissions (4.06 ± 7.52); 75.76% had OD. The psychometrics of the ES built with a non-linear model were: Area under the ROC Curve of 0.840; sensitivity 0.940; specificity, 0.416; Positive Predictive Value 0.834; Negative Predictive Value 0.690; positive likelihood ratio (LH), 1.61 and negative LH, 0.146. The ES screens in 6 s all patients admitted to a 419-bed hospital, identifies patients at greater risk of OD, and shows the risk for OD in the clinician's workstation. It is currently in use at our institution. Our ES provides accurate, systematic and universal screening for OD in real time during hospital admission of older patients, allowing the most appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to be selected for each patient.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersAgedAged, 80 and overArtificial IntelligenceHospitalizationHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk ManagementAgingDiagnosticsDysphagiaMachine learningScreening methodsSwallowing disorders

Identifiers

PMID36576585
OpenAlexW4313237560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.