Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36576538›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

Pedagogy in spine surgery: developing a free and open-access virtual simulator for lumbar pedicle screws placement.

Léonard Swann Chatelain, Marc Khalifé, Guillaume Riouallon, Pierre Guigui, Emmanuelle Ferrero

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of Virtual Reality Cognitive and Motor Exercises on Brain Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Léonard Swann ChatelainDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France. leonard.chatelain@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0939-6844
Marc KhaliféDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
Guillaume RiouallonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
Pierre GuiguiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle FerreroDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRHôpital Paris Saint-Joseph · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSimulators for pedicle screws placement range from basic sawbones to virtual reality. Yet, they remain expensive and often require specific devices. No free online virtual simulator has yet been developed. The goal was to design a freely accessible Web-based simulator.

methodsThe computer simulator consisted of a lumbar spine, a red box hiding the pedicles and five pairs of screws. After inserting the screws, the red box was removed to assess their position. A validation study was conducted with 24 medical students randomized into a simulation and a control group. All had a basic course on pedicle screws. The 12 simulation group students performed two sessions on computer. All 24 students then conducted a final common step on sawbones. The number of misplaced screws, types of breaches, and simulation times were analyzed.

resultsIn the final sawbones simulation, 96 real screws were studied. Control group misplaced 50% of their screws compared with only 20.8% in the simulation group (p < 0.05). More careful, simulation group students were slower to insert their real screws. Over the two computer simulations, the rate of misplaced screws decreased (12.5% vs. 38.3%), showing a good handling of the simulator. Students were able to analyze and correct their pedicle breaches.

conclusionThis tool is the first free online lumbar pedicle screws simulator. Simulation helped students to better position the final real screws on sawbones. This project showed it was possible to create a free educational tool with no special equipment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsSpinal FusionSurgery, Computer-AssistedComputer SimulationHumansLumbar VertebraePedagogyPedicle screwsSimulationSimulatorSurgery

Identifiers

PMID36576538
OpenAlexW4313237191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.