ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Clavicle shaft fractures in childhood and adolescence : Consensus report of the Pediatric Traumatology Section of the German Society for Trauma Surgery].
Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Different expectations regarding the prehospital care of injured children? : A comparison between pediatric surgeons and trauma surgeons].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- [Treatment of clavicle fractures in children and adolescents : Conservative and surgical treatment options with a focus on the figure-of-eight style brace and intrafocal intramedullary nail osteosynthesis].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2025Article
- Rational Usage of Fracture Imaging in Children and Adolescents.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClavicle shaft fractures are among the most common fractures in childhood and adolescence. In the past they were almost exclusively treated conservatively but in recent years there has been an increase in surgical treatment. Nevertheless, exact recommendations for the choice of diagnostics and for the treatment regimen do not yet exist. MATERIAL AND
methodsTherefore, our aim was to develop a consensus within the 7th scientific working meeting of the section for pediatric traumatology in the German Society for Trauma Surgery based on expert opinion.
resultsSingle-plane radiographic imaging is considered the gold standard diagnostic tool. Children younger than 10 years are primarily treated conservatively, and the type of immobilization is secondary. In girls older than 12 years and boys older than 14 years, fractures dislocated by more than the shaft width and shortened by > 2 cm should be treated by open reduction and stabilized by osteosynthesis, followed by free-functional follow-up treatment.
conclusionIn addition to X‑rays, diagnostics using ultrasound must be further established. Treatment continues to be primarily conservative, but surgical treatment is also important, especially in adolescents. If the indications are correct, a good outcome can be expected regardless of the choice of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.