ArticlePediatric cardiology2024
Idiopathic Pericardial Effusions in Children: Workup and Final Diagnoses.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric idiopathic pericardial effusions are common and often have a prolonged clinical course. We hypothesized that these effusions have no standardized diagnostic workup, and ultimately have a final etiology not initially appreciated. To test these hypotheses, a hospital system-wide retrospective (1/1/1990-10/1/2019) cohort study of pericardial effusions in children (< 18 years) was conducted. Effusions were grouped by etiology and patients receiving an initial idiopathic diagnosis were further analyzed. Effusion size, diagnostic workup, final diagnosis, and time to resolution were abstracted. In total, 42/366 effusions were initially diagnosed as idiopathic. Workup was not standardized and included up to six laboratory tests including pericardial fluid analysis and infectious, metabolic, rheumatologic and thyroid workups. Treatment course involved 1 readmission in 24%, and > 1 readmission in 12%. Resolution of effusion occurred in 83% of patients within a median of 1 admission (range 1-4). Of those effusions initially deemed idiopathic, 12/42 (29%) were later found to have an underlying etiologic diagnosis including: autoimmune (7, 58%), neoplastic (2, 16%), infectious (2, 16%), and renal (1, 8%). Children initially diagnosed with idiopathic pericardial effusions have an underlying etiologic diagnosis 29% of the time, and a standardized workup may prevent delays in definitive diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.