Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36576518›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2023

Successful eradication rate following one-stage septic knee and hip exchange in selected pre-operative culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections.

Luigi Zanna, Rudy Sangaletti, Christian Lausmann, Thorsten Gehrke, Mustafa Citak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Periprosthetic joint infections: state-of-the-art.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luigi Zanna *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany.
Rudy Sangaletti *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian LausmannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany.
Thorsten GehrkeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany.
Mustafa CitakDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany. mcitak@gmx.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3207-7101
Helios Endo-Klinik Hamburg · DEAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe main requirement for performing the one-stage septic exchange is the pre-operative identification of the pathogen and its susceptibility. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the success rate with special focus on reinfection in a cohort of patients who underwent one-stage septic knee or hip revision for pre-operative culture-negative PJI.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 640 patients treated by one-stage revision for chronic knee or hip PJI between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Only cases with pre-operative culture-negative PJI, with culture-negative synovial aspirations and one negative open biopsy, were analyzed. We evaluated the septic and aseptic complication and the rate of complication-free survival defined as the time from the date of first operation and the date of complication events.

resultsA total of 22 patients fulfilled the inclusion and were enrolled. The mean age of the group was 73.2 ± 9.8 years, with a median ASA score of 3 (range 3-4). After mean follow-up of 3.6 ± 2.6 years, 86.4% (19 out of 22) of patients reported no complications. Two patients (9.1%) after one-stage hip required revision arthroplasty due to septic failure, while one patient (4.5%) with one-stage knee had revision for femoral component aseptic loosening.

conclusionOur analysis suggests that the absence of pre-operative pathogen detection may not be contraindication to the one-stage revision in selected patients. The one-stage exchange might be considered in patients with pre-operative negative cultures in presence of ASA > 3 and multiple comorbidities that are not able to tolerate multiple surgeries.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProsthesis-Related InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overHumansKnee JointMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesArthroplastyCulture negativeExchange arthroplastyHipInfectionKneeOne-stagePJI

Identifiers

PMID36576518
OpenAlexW4312215551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.