Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36576194›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Associations between inflexible job conditions, health and healthcare utilisation in England: retrospective cross-sectional study.

Charlie Moss, Luke Aaron Munford, Matt Sutton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Scoping review of outpatient health services utilization among women.Primary health care research & development · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charlie MossHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK charlie.moss@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4694-378X
Luke Aaron MunfordHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4540-6744
Matt SuttonHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N015126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the strength of association between having an inflexible job and health-related quality of life and healthcare utilisation; and to explore heterogeneity in the effects by gender, age and area-level deprivation.

designRetrospective cross-sectional study.

settingSeven waves of the English General Practice Patient Survey between 2012 and 2017.

participants1 232 884 people aged 16-64 years and in full-time employment. We measured job inflexibility by inability to take time away from work during usual working hours to seek medical care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L); number of months since the respondent last saw a general practitioner (GP) or nurse; use of out-of-hours general practice in the past 6 months. We used regression analyses to estimate the strength of association between outcomes and having an inflexible job, adjusting for person and area-level characteristics.

resultsOne-third of respondents reported job inflexibility. The probability of job inflexibility was higher at younger ages and in more deprived areas. Job inflexibility was associated with lower EQ-5D-5L utility scores of 0.017 (95% CI 0.016 to 0.018) for women and 0.016 (95% CI 0.015 to 0.017) for men. Women were more affected than men in the mental health domain. The reduction in health-related quality of life associated with having an inflexible job was greater for employees who were older or lived in more deprived areas. Having an inflexible job was associated with a longer time since the last visit to their GP of 0.234 (95% CI 0.201 to 0.268) months for women and 0.199 (95% CI 0.152 to 0.183) months for men.

conclusionsInequalities in the prevalence of inflexible jobs contribute to inequalities in health. One mechanism may be through reduced access to healthcare. Policymakers and employers should ensure that all employees have sufficient job flexibility to protect their health.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareQuality of LifeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesoccupational & industrial medicineprimary carepublic healthsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID36576194
PMCPMC9723827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.