Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36576131›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2022

LMAS: evaluating metagenomic short de novo assembly methods through defined communities.

Catarina Inês Mendes, Pedro Vila-Cerqueira, Yair Motro, Jacob Moran-Gilad, João André Carriço, Mário Ramirez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catarina Inês MendesInstituto de Microbiologia, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3090-7426
Pedro Vila-CerqueiraInstituto de Microbiologia, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6121-8906
Yair MotroFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 8410501 Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1289-6919
Jacob Moran-GiladFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 8410501 Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9134-050X
João André CarriçoInstituto de Microbiologia, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-2722
Mário RamirezInstituto de Microbiologia, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4084-6233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe de novo assembly of raw sequence data is key in metagenomic analysis. It allows recovering draft genomes from a pool of mixed raw reads, yielding longer sequences that offer contextual information and provide a more complete picture of the microbial community.

findingsTo better compare de novo assemblers for metagenomic analysis, LMAS (Last Metagenomic Assembler Standing) was developed as a flexible platform allowing users to evaluate assembler performance given known standard communities. Overall, in our test datasets, k-mer De Bruijn graph assemblers outperformed the alternative approaches but came with a greater computational cost. Furthermore, assemblers branded as metagenomic specific did not consistently outperform other genomic assemblers in metagenomic samples. Some assemblers still in use, such as ABySS, MetaHipmer2, minia, and VelvetOptimiser, perform relatively poorly and should be used with caution when assembling complex samples. Meaningful strain resolution at the single-nucleotide polymorphism level was not achieved, even by the best assemblers tested.

conclusionsThe choice of a de novo assembler depends on the computational resources available, the replicon of interest, and the major goals of the analysis. No single assembler appeared an ideal choice for short-read metagenomic prokaryote replicon assembly, each showing specific strengths. The choice of metagenomic assembler should be guided by user requirements and characteristics of the sample of interest, and LMAS provides an interactive evaluation platform for this purpose. LMAS is open source, and the workflow and its documentation are available at https://github.com/B-UMMI/LMAS and https://lmas.readthedocs.io/, respectively.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeSequence Analysis, DNAbenchmarkde novo assemblydraft genome qualityshotgun metagenomicssimulation

Identifiers

PMID36576131
PMCPMC9795473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.