Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36575995›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023

Multi-horizon predictive models for guiding extracorporeal resource allocation in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Bing Xue, Neel Shah, Hanqing Yang, Thomas Kannampallil, Philip Richard Orrin Payne, Chenyang Lu, Ahmed Sameh Said

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bing XueDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Neel ShahDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Hanqing YangDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Thomas KannampallilDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4119-4836
Philip Richard Orrin PayneInstitute of Informatics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9532-2998
Chenyang LuDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Ahmed Sameh SaidDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1215-2664
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) resource allocation tools are currently lacking. We developed machine learning (ML) models for predicting COVID-19 patients at risk of receiving ECMO to guide patient triage and resource allocation. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe included COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units for >24 h from March 2020 to October 2021, divided into training and testing development and testing-only holdout cohorts. We developed ECMO deployment timely prediction model ForecastECMO using Gradient Boosting Tree (GBT), with pre-ECMO prediction horizons from 0 to 48 h, compared to PaO2/FiO2 ratio, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, PREdiction of Survival on ECMO Therapy score, logistic regression, and 30 pre-selected clinical variables GBT Clinical GBT models, with area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) and precision recall curve (AUPRC) metrics.

resultsECMO prevalence was 2.89% and 1.73% in development and holdout cohorts. ForecastECMO had the best performance in both cohorts. At the 18-h prediction horizon, a potentially clinically actionable pre-ECMO window, ForecastECMO, had the highest AUROC (0.94 and 0.95) and AUPRC (0.54 and 0.37) in development and holdout cohorts in identifying ECMO patients without data 18 h prior to ECMO. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsWe developed a multi-horizon model, ForecastECMO, with high performance in identifying patients receiving ECMO at various prediction horizons. This model has potential to be used as early alert tool to guide ECMO resource allocation for COVID-19 patients. Future prospective multicenter validation would provide evidence for generalizability and real-world application of such models to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsOrgan Dysfunction ScoresRetrospective StudiesCOVID-19early alertECMOmachine learningpredictionresource allocation

Identifiers

PMID36575995
PMCPMC10018267
OpenAlexW4313236824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.